Posts
The Ashford Herald, 18th November 2010, contains many warnings to the public this Christmas.
Bizarre Thefts
A nurse seemingly suffered a strange theft attempt in Willesborough, where two women approached her in tears, claiming their mother had died. They then put costume jewellery around her neck and by sleight of hand removed her own 22ct gold necklace. When she pushed them away,and went to call the police, the women threw her necklace at her.
This is clearly an odd case of attempted theft, but it would be advisable to be on your guard when comforting unknown women in the street?
Christmas Crimes
We should all raise our awareness at christmas, when expensive items are generally purchased and carried around.
Kent Police are drawing attention to the risks of putting shopping bags on view in the rears of your cars, in case it leads to theft.
Also, be aware of what boxes you put outside your house for the bin men to collect. There is no point in needlessly advertising your new telly, camera and stereo to the whole neighbourhood.
Please also ensure your sheds and garages are locked, as the spate of thefts accross Ashford show no sign of stopping.
Sunday 21 November 2010
Friday 12 November 2010
Saddening News
I was saddened to hear of the death of Cllr John Kemp of Kennington Ward today.
Cllr John Kemp was a good councillor who was highly regarded in the ward and borough as a whole.
Cllr John Kemp was a good councillor who was highly regarded in the ward and borough as a whole.
Fantastic Response from Kent Police
I want to commend Kent Police on their response to an incident that happened this evening.
This evening my husband went to the shop.
On his way down Faversham Road, innocuously committing that crime of walking on the pavement, he was surprised to hear some commotion and a revving engine.
A car then swerved behind him on to the pavement as it's occupants, rowdy males, yelled "get out of the f-ing way".
Understandably my husband felt very threatened. He was then subject to abusive comments along the lines of "yeah you'd better carry on walking" and "we'll be waiting for you boyo" and "we're gonna get you".
I am pleased to say my husband carried on walking, didn't turn around or respond in any way. To do so, as many know, would have provoked confrontation.
He did have the forethought to check which house, car colour and registration on his way back, however.
He put in a phone call to Kent Police and they responded, sending two officers round within 30 minutes.
They were concerned the people who threatened him may know where he lived (good thinking), and went to the property to check out the occupants.
I am really delighted they took something which may have just been ASB but could equally have been quite a dangerous incident, so seriously.
This evening my husband went to the shop.
On his way down Faversham Road, innocuously committing that crime of walking on the pavement, he was surprised to hear some commotion and a revving engine.
A car then swerved behind him on to the pavement as it's occupants, rowdy males, yelled "get out of the f-ing way".
Understandably my husband felt very threatened. He was then subject to abusive comments along the lines of "yeah you'd better carry on walking" and "we'll be waiting for you boyo" and "we're gonna get you".
I am pleased to say my husband carried on walking, didn't turn around or respond in any way. To do so, as many know, would have provoked confrontation.
He did have the forethought to check which house, car colour and registration on his way back, however.
He put in a phone call to Kent Police and they responded, sending two officers round within 30 minutes.
They were concerned the people who threatened him may know where he lived (good thinking), and went to the property to check out the occupants.
I am really delighted they took something which may have just been ASB but could equally have been quite a dangerous incident, so seriously.
Friday 15 October 2010
Lateral Thinking Friday on Local News
I have recently subscribed to Kent Online News Updates. This allows me to keep up with the news.
In true "Friday" mode this afternoon, when an alert popped up on my blackberry, I thought the title "Mum of 13: I'm not a scrounger" was worth a look.
The story is pretty meek all things considering. A woman objecting to being misrepresented as a person who wastes all of her benefits on televisions and swimmingpools. Fair enough.
But then I cast my eye over the comments.
Delightfully, and predictably, an small debate was being exercised on the rights to claim benefits.
Phrases such as "what is the world coming to" reared out at me in true Daily Fail fashion. But interestingly, the following correspondence caught my eye;
Neil Boyo wrote:
Oi Lynn, shut ya mouf.
my mums got 14 kids and lives off benefits. so wot.
if someones gonna giv it why work for it. i think your all mugs for workin.
my mums the best, she can llok after the kids and still box you up down
Followed by
MECH SEALS BOI wrote:
WELL DONE NEIL BOYO FOR STANDING UP FOR WHAT YOU BELIEVE IN AND NOT CONFORMING TO THE MASSES. I ONLY HAVE 6 CHAVIES AT THE MO BUT HOPE TO ONE DAY HAVE SOME MORE IF THE GOVERMENTS STOPS BEING TIGHT. TIL THEN I'LL HAVE TO USE MY DISSABILITY BENIFITS AS A TOP UP
Now, here's some lateral thinking for you
What is wrong with that statement?
No?
Try this one;
Got it yet?
No?
Let's give you a highlight;
See it now?
For people that cannot spell "benefits", I have admit my sceptical surprise at the use of the word "conforming".
How about the next one?
Perhaps there is a slight wind up / egging on going on here to encourage more comments and controversy?
PS I find lanugage analysis fascinating, see the Lindbergh Kidnapping for some interesting examples.
In true "Friday" mode this afternoon, when an alert popped up on my blackberry, I thought the title "Mum of 13: I'm not a scrounger" was worth a look.
The story is pretty meek all things considering. A woman objecting to being misrepresented as a person who wastes all of her benefits on televisions and swimmingpools. Fair enough.
But then I cast my eye over the comments.
Delightfully, and predictably, an small debate was being exercised on the rights to claim benefits.
Phrases such as "what is the world coming to" reared out at me in true Daily Fail fashion. But interestingly, the following correspondence caught my eye;
Neil Boyo wrote:
Oi Lynn, shut ya mouf.
my mums got 14 kids and lives off benefits. so wot.
if someones gonna giv it why work for it. i think your all mugs for workin.
my mums the best, she can llok after the kids and still box you up down
Followed by
MECH SEALS BOI wrote:
WELL DONE NEIL BOYO FOR STANDING UP FOR WHAT YOU BELIEVE IN AND NOT CONFORMING TO THE MASSES. I ONLY HAVE 6 CHAVIES AT THE MO BUT HOPE TO ONE DAY HAVE SOME MORE IF THE GOVERMENTS STOPS BEING TIGHT. TIL THEN I'LL HAVE TO USE MY DISSABILITY BENIFITS AS A TOP UP
Now, here's some lateral thinking for you
What is wrong with that statement?
No?
Try this one;
Mech Seals Boi wrote:
Stop all havin a pop at Neil boyo! I think your all jellous as he has more time off than you and probably more extra cash at the end of the month therefore a better life style. your all like crying children, grow up and sort you own lifes out. If you cant bet them join them, you all have the option to live the easy life like neil and myself. and as for the big man DJ, your threats dont worry us, we all know your not gonna turn up down the doll so do one mug
Got it yet?
No?
Let's give you a highlight;
See it now?
For people that cannot spell "benefits", I have admit my sceptical surprise at the use of the word "conforming".
How about the next one?
Perhaps there is a slight wind up / egging on going on here to encourage more comments and controversy?
PS I find lanugage analysis fascinating, see the Lindbergh Kidnapping for some interesting examples.
Sunday 10 October 2010
Open Letter: Introduction of Charges For Local Businesses
Dear Sirs,
I was absolutely appalled to read the introduction of charges for local businesses to display an A board on the high street outside their premises. It seems that this is Ashford Borough Council's answer to their inability to raise council tax next year.
To quote the economic deficit as a reason for an introduction of such a charge, and to mention removing the clutter in the high street, when local businesses are failing, is simply an atrocious misunderstanding of the situation.
Or perhaps the true reason is some ludicrous health and safety policy incase someone is injured. In which case, local businesses are covered by employee liability, and there is no need for funding to be added to this pot by the council.
In addition to the 50%-100% rise for market stall rents, and the ongoing reduction of services that residents see in Ashford, I do wonder where all of this "stealth" funding is going.
Campanologist Chris Cooper raised some serious questions in his protest at St Mary's Church about local government spending and the allocation of finances. As I'm sure most residents would agree, we would prefer to maintain levels of crime prevention, rubbish services and court services than invest in design schemes such as forecourt stations, shared space and converted churches.
Sadly, with the removal of the State of the Borough Debate, one of the last few remaining democratic processes in the area, means this question cannot be raised easily.
With empty premises in Ashford, the greatly reducing footfall since the isolation of the town centre and numerous empty business premises around the borough, I would think the Ashford Borough Council would be more inclined to promote local community rather than ban them from increasing trade.
Yours faithfully,
Kelly-Marie Blundell
I was absolutely appalled to read the introduction of charges for local businesses to display an A board on the high street outside their premises. It seems that this is Ashford Borough Council's answer to their inability to raise council tax next year.
To quote the economic deficit as a reason for an introduction of such a charge, and to mention removing the clutter in the high street, when local businesses are failing, is simply an atrocious misunderstanding of the situation.
Or perhaps the true reason is some ludicrous health and safety policy incase someone is injured. In which case, local businesses are covered by employee liability, and there is no need for funding to be added to this pot by the council.
In addition to the 50%-100% rise for market stall rents, and the ongoing reduction of services that residents see in Ashford, I do wonder where all of this "stealth" funding is going.
Campanologist Chris Cooper raised some serious questions in his protest at St Mary's Church about local government spending and the allocation of finances. As I'm sure most residents would agree, we would prefer to maintain levels of crime prevention, rubbish services and court services than invest in design schemes such as forecourt stations, shared space and converted churches.
Sadly, with the removal of the State of the Borough Debate, one of the last few remaining democratic processes in the area, means this question cannot be raised easily.
With empty premises in Ashford, the greatly reducing footfall since the isolation of the town centre and numerous empty business premises around the borough, I would think the Ashford Borough Council would be more inclined to promote local community rather than ban them from increasing trade.
Yours faithfully,
Kelly-Marie Blundell
Ashford's "Stealth Taxes" For Local Businesses
I was absolutely horrified to read the Ashford Borough Council intends to charge businesses for putting a board in the street.
This appears to be another stealth tax introduction by the borough council, alongside increasing market rental by 50% (per hour), charging for leafleting and advertising and a significant increase in parking charges.
I do intend to conduct a Freedom of Information request to find out exactly where all this new revenue accrued is going.
We do not see it in the provision of services as residents, I can assure you of that.
I am an Ashfordian born and ,and in the last three years have seen my council tax rise, the allocation of police community resource officers changed from one ward to one to four wards, the loss of the custody suite and subsequent jobs within the police station, the introduction of significantly higher parking prices, the destruction of buildings to build car parks and further isolate the town centre, the introduction of an expensive high-speed rail service but no investment in local services.
We have had the wonderful stories of people making their own warning signs about potholes within the borough, we have had green waste collection removed, I regularly support residents whose wardens have been removed from their housing, I am now campaigning against the introduction of charges for the Lifeline system for elderly residents which has replaced the wardens.
I have watched the market be forced from Elwick Road to Bank Street, then away from the bandstand and down to the lower area of the high Street where is reduced often to three or four stalls on a week day and five or six at a weekend.
There were rumours of local community centre at Bybrook being closed, buses do not provide disability access, and more land is being used for more houses when there is no community infrastructures as a supporter let alone council services.
I'm terrified of the day when Ashford Borough Council will decide to follow in the footsteps of Barnett and provide an "EasyJet" no-frills council service for seemingly more money than we had paid before.
This appears to be another stealth tax introduction by the borough council, alongside increasing market rental by 50% (per hour), charging for leafleting and advertising and a significant increase in parking charges.
I do intend to conduct a Freedom of Information request to find out exactly where all this new revenue accrued is going.
We do not see it in the provision of services as residents, I can assure you of that.
I am an Ashfordian born and ,and in the last three years have seen my council tax rise, the allocation of police community resource officers changed from one ward to one to four wards, the loss of the custody suite and subsequent jobs within the police station, the introduction of significantly higher parking prices, the destruction of buildings to build car parks and further isolate the town centre, the introduction of an expensive high-speed rail service but no investment in local services.
We have had the wonderful stories of people making their own warning signs about potholes within the borough, we have had green waste collection removed, I regularly support residents whose wardens have been removed from their housing, I am now campaigning against the introduction of charges for the Lifeline system for elderly residents which has replaced the wardens.
I have watched the market be forced from Elwick Road to Bank Street, then away from the bandstand and down to the lower area of the high Street where is reduced often to three or four stalls on a week day and five or six at a weekend.
There were rumours of local community centre at Bybrook being closed, buses do not provide disability access, and more land is being used for more houses when there is no community infrastructures as a supporter let alone council services.
I'm terrified of the day when Ashford Borough Council will decide to follow in the footsteps of Barnett and provide an "EasyJet" no-frills council service for seemingly more money than we had paid before.
One Passionate Campanologist (Pun Intended) and Ashford's Public Sector Finances
Following the national press interest process of bellringer Chris Cooper in his tent at St Mary's Church, I feel that such passion and dedication to the cause merits comment.
I went round to the churchyard on Friday to see if I could get the opportunity to speak to him. However, having been round three times, I realised that he must have indeed been moved on.
Given that the front page on the Kentish Express identified he will impending him on a hunger strike, I was naturally concerned.
It seems that Mr Cooper was moved on on Thursday following the groundbreaking ceremony (no pun intended).
There are a lot of pertinent points to be raised from about the redevelopment of St Mary's Church.
Firstly, the development has an integral selling point to The Church, as it will mean that any damage to the 12th century property will be repaired by money from the grants and Ashford Borough Council rather than the Dioceses having to foot the bill. After all, they've just hosted the Pope coming to the UK, they couldn't possibly have the money to make minor structural repairs.
Secondly, it is worth noting that the money allocated to the churchyard is ring fenced for creative arts development. Therefore, in spite of Mr Cooper's valiant protest, the money could not be used to save the magistrates and county courts within the town. Nor could it be used to install CCTV camera or fund extra presence roles of the churchyard to help mitigate antisocial behaviour levels. This is the legacy you may or may not agree, with but ultimately it is hard to overthrow.
Thirdly as fellow Liberal Democrat campaigner Jeremy Adby points out, the redevelopment of St Mary's Church is already costed a terrifying £191,000 and that was without the ground being broken.
When facing a significant public sector deficit, ludicrous introductions of charges for advertising on the high street and regularly soaring council tax, it is shocking that so much money could be invested into something that hasn't happened yet.
Chris Cooper is quite right to question where our public finances go, our council tax has been rising above inflation levels for a significant number of years, and in addition to localise "stealth taxes", we do not seem to be reaping many benefits in Ashford.
In the last two years we have lost our custody suites, we may soon lose police station, our PCSO budgets have been halved so the number of community support officers on the street has been affected accordingly, potholes have worsened, our green waste collection has been withdrawn,wardens have been removed from older people's accommodation and the council are now charging for Lifeline and high street notice boards. If all of this is going to fund the development of the church, I would rather they paid more attention to the fundamentals of society.
We may have low expectations of what Borough councils are meant to provide, but it has to be agreed that rubbish collection, community safety, housing, and care for older and younger people is integral to the services they have. I would prefer to see the council concentrating on fulfilling these services to the highest quality before investing vast amounts of money in something that has raised so much controversy, passion and debate, especially when other services are so greatly needed.
I went round to the churchyard on Friday to see if I could get the opportunity to speak to him. However, having been round three times, I realised that he must have indeed been moved on.
Given that the front page on the Kentish Express identified he will impending him on a hunger strike, I was naturally concerned.
It seems that Mr Cooper was moved on on Thursday following the groundbreaking ceremony (no pun intended).
There are a lot of pertinent points to be raised from about the redevelopment of St Mary's Church.
Firstly, the development has an integral selling point to The Church, as it will mean that any damage to the 12th century property will be repaired by money from the grants and Ashford Borough Council rather than the Dioceses having to foot the bill. After all, they've just hosted the Pope coming to the UK, they couldn't possibly have the money to make minor structural repairs.
Secondly, it is worth noting that the money allocated to the churchyard is ring fenced for creative arts development. Therefore, in spite of Mr Cooper's valiant protest, the money could not be used to save the magistrates and county courts within the town. Nor could it be used to install CCTV camera or fund extra presence roles of the churchyard to help mitigate antisocial behaviour levels. This is the legacy you may or may not agree, with but ultimately it is hard to overthrow.
Thirdly as fellow Liberal Democrat campaigner Jeremy Adby points out, the redevelopment of St Mary's Church is already costed a terrifying £191,000 and that was without the ground being broken.
When facing a significant public sector deficit, ludicrous introductions of charges for advertising on the high street and regularly soaring council tax, it is shocking that so much money could be invested into something that hasn't happened yet.
Chris Cooper is quite right to question where our public finances go, our council tax has been rising above inflation levels for a significant number of years, and in addition to localise "stealth taxes", we do not seem to be reaping many benefits in Ashford.
In the last two years we have lost our custody suites, we may soon lose police station, our PCSO budgets have been halved so the number of community support officers on the street has been affected accordingly, potholes have worsened, our green waste collection has been withdrawn,wardens have been removed from older people's accommodation and the council are now charging for Lifeline and high street notice boards. If all of this is going to fund the development of the church, I would rather they paid more attention to the fundamentals of society.
We may have low expectations of what Borough councils are meant to provide, but it has to be agreed that rubbish collection, community safety, housing, and care for older and younger people is integral to the services they have. I would prefer to see the council concentrating on fulfilling these services to the highest quality before investing vast amounts of money in something that has raised so much controversy, passion and debate, especially when other services are so greatly needed.
Saturday 2 October 2010
Kennington Community Forum Update
I became an executive committee member of the Kennington Community Forum at the Annual General Meeting in July 2010.
Our last meeting was held on Tuesday 28th September 2010 at St Mary's Church, Kennington.
Local Crime and Community Issues
PC Mandy Surgeoner identified a rise in motor vehicle theft. Please be aware of what you leave on display in your car and notify your neighbours of the impending risks.
"No Trick or Treat" signs are now available from Kent Police to protect people during the Halloween season. KCF will be posting one on their website for people to print off.
Following complaints of speeding on Faversham Road, Trinity Road and Canterbury Road, police have carried out covert average speed checks.
Canterbury Road identified average speed checks of 33.3mph AM, 33.7mph at noon and 35mph PM
Trinity Road identifies an average speed of 34mph AM, 35mph noon and 34mph PM
Faversham Road identifies an average speed of 31mph AM, 31mph noon and 32mph PM.
While this does not seem excessive,top speeds were recorded at 47mph on all three roads at various times.
As a resident of Faversham Road myself, I hear vehicles speeding a lot, and I am aware of the constant flow of young and older people that are most at risk. I look forward to the return of speed check camera and an increase in visits from the Hawkeye Police Vehicle.
Members of the public raised issues with traffic on Ball Lane, going the wrong way in the evenings. Kent Police are to send vehicles down there periodically to prevent this happening.
Health Walks Initiative
Natural England and NHS Eastern and Coastal Kent are working in partnership to promote the positive health benefits of regular walks.
Martin Jordan is coordinating the project for Ashford and wishes to draw residents attention to walks leaving from the Sure Start Centre in boxing and from New Hayesbank Surgery on a regular basis. Further information can be found on the Kennington website and they are actively seeking volunteer walk coordinator and leaders.
Kennington Hockey Club
Much debate has been found over potential developments at the hockey club. The hockey club desperately need to relocate to expand and develop their premises, and the proposed selling their property to Provis developers who would then put 600 houses on the site.
Regular readers of the Kentish express will be aware of the issues surrounding this development, including the lateral effect that such development will lead to the reintroduction of the Link Road and Kennington North Proposals.
Residents in Kennington are presented with a catch 22.
The development of the hockey club would have significant benefits for sports in Kent, including rehousing cricket, football and hockey teams in more suitable facilities away from residential accommodation.
However, there is an indication that the majority of residents are against the development of the link road, which cannot be built without housing in Kennington North to justify the cost.
Bovis homes and Hockey Club will be hosting an exhibition on Friday the 1st October and Saturday on 2nd October for residents to visit and comment.
Planning Applications
Objections have been raised regarding the demolition of a property and replacing with six bungalows on Grovesnor Road.
Following the rejection of the application for 11 houses on The Street, a new application has been proposed for six houses and the rejection is being appealed.
There is a proposal for Warren Lane to build 66 sheltered houses and an office block by Pentland homes
Further information can be found on the Ashford Borough Council website.
Public Consultation
Ashford Borough Council has finally agreed to open public consultation on the licensing of "lapdancing" premises in the borough. Currently, there is no requirement to these premises to be licensed but there is the option to the council to consider licensing by the magistrates courts. I will post a link as soon as this is available.
Our last meeting was held on Tuesday 28th September 2010 at St Mary's Church, Kennington.
Local Crime and Community Issues
PC Mandy Surgeoner identified a rise in motor vehicle theft. Please be aware of what you leave on display in your car and notify your neighbours of the impending risks.
"No Trick or Treat" signs are now available from Kent Police to protect people during the Halloween season. KCF will be posting one on their website for people to print off.
Following complaints of speeding on Faversham Road, Trinity Road and Canterbury Road, police have carried out covert average speed checks.
Canterbury Road identified average speed checks of 33.3mph AM, 33.7mph at noon and 35mph PM
Trinity Road identifies an average speed of 34mph AM, 35mph noon and 34mph PM
Faversham Road identifies an average speed of 31mph AM, 31mph noon and 32mph PM.
While this does not seem excessive,top speeds were recorded at 47mph on all three roads at various times.
As a resident of Faversham Road myself, I hear vehicles speeding a lot, and I am aware of the constant flow of young and older people that are most at risk. I look forward to the return of speed check camera and an increase in visits from the Hawkeye Police Vehicle.
Members of the public raised issues with traffic on Ball Lane, going the wrong way in the evenings. Kent Police are to send vehicles down there periodically to prevent this happening.
Health Walks Initiative
Natural England and NHS Eastern and Coastal Kent are working in partnership to promote the positive health benefits of regular walks.
Martin Jordan is coordinating the project for Ashford and wishes to draw residents attention to walks leaving from the Sure Start Centre in boxing and from New Hayesbank Surgery on a regular basis. Further information can be found on the Kennington website and they are actively seeking volunteer walk coordinator and leaders.
Kennington Hockey Club
Much debate has been found over potential developments at the hockey club. The hockey club desperately need to relocate to expand and develop their premises, and the proposed selling their property to Provis developers who would then put 600 houses on the site.
Regular readers of the Kentish express will be aware of the issues surrounding this development, including the lateral effect that such development will lead to the reintroduction of the Link Road and Kennington North Proposals.
Residents in Kennington are presented with a catch 22.
The development of the hockey club would have significant benefits for sports in Kent, including rehousing cricket, football and hockey teams in more suitable facilities away from residential accommodation.
However, there is an indication that the majority of residents are against the development of the link road, which cannot be built without housing in Kennington North to justify the cost.
Bovis homes and Hockey Club will be hosting an exhibition on Friday the 1st October and Saturday on 2nd October for residents to visit and comment.
Planning Applications
Objections have been raised regarding the demolition of a property and replacing with six bungalows on Grovesnor Road.
Following the rejection of the application for 11 houses on The Street, a new application has been proposed for six houses and the rejection is being appealed.
There is a proposal for Warren Lane to build 66 sheltered houses and an office block by Pentland homes
Further information can be found on the Ashford Borough Council website.
Public Consultation
Ashford Borough Council has finally agreed to open public consultation on the licensing of "lapdancing" premises in the borough. Currently, there is no requirement to these premises to be licensed but there is the option to the council to consider licensing by the magistrates courts. I will post a link as soon as this is available.
Monday 27 September 2010
Tea and Coffee FOI is Farcical in Light of Other ABC Spends
Labour Campaigner Brendan Chitton is aghast at money spent by Ashford Borough Council on Tea and Coffee in the last three years.
I suggest he applied his Freedom of Information Act Legislation more vigourouslly to his own party and makes a note of Liam Byrne's letter left in the Treasury at the end of the Labour Government.
However, it is prudent to point out that Ashford Borough Council has circa 500 employees, working circa 350 days per year. Therefore the response provided identifies Ashford Borough Councill only spent 2p per employee per day in the three year period.
Perhaps Mr Chitton has only covered Local Government in his Politics studies so far, and would greatly benefit from full investigation into the remits of excessive spending in local government before launching such a meagre campaign again.
May I suggest he begins with the Audit Commission, Commercial Sensitivity and Local Enterprise Partnerships?
I suggest he applied his Freedom of Information Act Legislation more vigourouslly to his own party and makes a note of Liam Byrne's letter left in the Treasury at the end of the Labour Government.
However, it is prudent to point out that Ashford Borough Council has circa 500 employees, working circa 350 days per year. Therefore the response provided identifies Ashford Borough Councill only spent 2p per employee per day in the three year period.
Perhaps Mr Chitton has only covered Local Government in his Politics studies so far, and would greatly benefit from full investigation into the remits of excessive spending in local government before launching such a meagre campaign again.
May I suggest he begins with the Audit Commission, Commercial Sensitivity and Local Enterprise Partnerships?
Open Letter: Proactive Response Needed to Rise in Hare Coursing
Dear Sirs,
Hare Coursing is a barbaric sport, and it is a shame to see a rise in this illegal activity in Ashford and Tenterden (Ashford Herald 23.9.10).
Cruelty to animals should never be justified and I am pleased to see Kent Police taking the crime seriously.
However, I would like to see strategic and proactive action taken in future years.
Asking locals to report is all very well, but when members of the public are assaulted for interfering, the old adage "prevent is better than cure" would be well applied.
Kind regards,
Kelly-Marie Blundell
Ashford Liberal Democrats
Kennington
Hare Coursing is a barbaric sport, and it is a shame to see a rise in this illegal activity in Ashford and Tenterden (Ashford Herald 23.9.10).
Cruelty to animals should never be justified and I am pleased to see Kent Police taking the crime seriously.
However, I would like to see strategic and proactive action taken in future years.
Asking locals to report is all very well, but when members of the public are assaulted for interfering, the old adage "prevent is better than cure" would be well applied.
Kind regards,
Kelly-Marie Blundell
Ashford Liberal Democrats
Kennington
Open Letter: Ashford Herald 23.9.10
Dear Sirs
While it is wonderful that Ashford's Future is investing in the Skate Park at last, it is regrettable and indicative of a lack of foresight that this decision comes after the summer holidays.
The school children were therefore presented with inferior replacements and a lack of discussion for the duration of the summer.
Teenagers I spoke to at Ashford Skate Park in July were prepared to fund raise themselves to help repair and maintain the park. This perhaps would have helped empower the community more and contributed to national agendas on Big Society.
We ought to be engaging with communities, not just swooping in and out and dictating behaviour.
Kind regards,
Kelly-Marie Blundell
Ashford Liberal Democrats
Kennington
While it is wonderful that Ashford's Future is investing in the Skate Park at last, it is regrettable and indicative of a lack of foresight that this decision comes after the summer holidays.
The school children were therefore presented with inferior replacements and a lack of discussion for the duration of the summer.
Teenagers I spoke to at Ashford Skate Park in July were prepared to fund raise themselves to help repair and maintain the park. This perhaps would have helped empower the community more and contributed to national agendas on Big Society.
We ought to be engaging with communities, not just swooping in and out and dictating behaviour.
Kind regards,
Kelly-Marie Blundell
Ashford Liberal Democrats
Kennington
Saturday 7 August 2010
Response on Skate Park Letter
Further to Cllr Jim Wedgebury's letter in the Kentish Express (5th August 2010), I decided to test his theories and speak to a number of skateboarders at the skate park on Tannery Lane.
Those of you who didn't see the letter, Councillor Wedgebury implies that he has a great knowledge of skateboarding, apparently gained from YouTube, that is far superior to my own experience.
He then goes on to insinuate that skateboarders simply use designated sites to “train and home” their skills before indulging on dangerous and new sites.
Playing on Dangerous Sites
It is a rather strange response to my letter,, and given that I raised the issues of the danger of alternative sites now that the skate park is closed rather than the skate park directly contributing to this behaviour.
The teenagers were quick to inform me today that they have nowhere else to go and they come to skate at the designated site, because they genuinely enjoy skating. They prefer to do this than at other sites, and while a small minority will always choose to be heedless of the dangers of other areas, the majority simply want their skate park back.
Further to my warning in my letter, the manager of Wreckless informed me that she'd had two boys in with broken bones due to finding other locations which are not elected Skating areas.
Illogic al Strategic Planning
Seeing as I also pointed out the illogical strategic planning of Ashford Borough Council by removing the facilities at the beginning of the summer holidays and the importance of community engagement for all ages, I resent the comment that my argument is both populist and undermines the situation. Ashford Borough Council are quick to promote their “Saved A Million”, the need for community funding and maintenance of facilities, it seems strange they would chose such a time to change the Skate Park.
The Ashford Borough Council Website Is quick to announce that they “co-ordinate the Ashford Youth Forum Trust [to] better understand the needs of young people”.
Perhaps instead of wasting resources on a variety of “strategies” and “websites” for the young people, they should start by actually talking to them.
Gathering Users Opinion
Those present at the skate park today, all teenage males, were quick to point out that when the skate park was closed off they had nothing to do and nowhere to go. Short of spending vast amounts of money travelling to one of the nearby towns where the facilities are present, they have felt victimised without any explanation is why their facilities were withdrawn.
The frequent users of the Skate Park have been informed that they will only be without resources for three months and that the structures were unsafe.
Instead, those on skateboards, BMX's, scooters and rollerblades, have been provided with plywood structures that are full of the splinters, and, it appears, will have to wait until Christmas for any more facilities.
Although, according to Councillor Wedgebury's letter, they may not receive these facilities at all, if people don't vote for the money to be spent on this.
Danger to Local businesses
There is also a lateral effect of the closures skate park facilities.
Instead of being the thriving skate park it once was, a lot of residents have already moved to other towns. As Wreckless business owner Jacqueline said to me today, she has been unable to organise the annual skate competition and is already losing business as the skaters go to other towns.
And Finally
In view of the National government's proposals on Big Society, we can only hope that funding can be found to replace the facilities that have now gone.
Genuine community facilities are integral to the sustainability of any town, whether they serve the old, the young or the elected, they still ought to reflect the needs and desires of that community.
PS: As a disabled person, I am unable to partake in Skateboarding, but am keen to support all physical sports in spite of my inability to perform in them.
Sunday 1 August 2010
Open Letter: Protecting the Churchyard
Dear Sirs,
Ashford Borough Council's proposal to invest in bouncers to monitor the churchyard passageways nothing short of ludicrous (Kentish Express July 29, 2010).
As I wrote in the letters page in September 2009, the Conservative administration of Ashford Borough Council failed to support proposals for further street lighting or CCTV and furthermore have failed to respond fully to a petition submitted for better security measures in the churchyard in 2008.
This ongoing saga may make good news fodder, but the suffering of Jeremy Adby and co-residents is beyond a joke. As the Kentish Express states, residents had a meeting in March and only at the end of July to the Council decide to put into new street lights.
Employing bouncers is simply ridiculous when a quarter of our council tax money goes to policing the Borough. When the council can spend vast amounts of money on street lighting, consultants to discuss parking in a shared space and swimming facilities that are not usable for residents, one has to wonder how the budget is managed.
Kind regards,
Kelly-Marie Blundell
Ashford Liberal Democrats
Kennington
Ashford Borough Council's proposal to invest in bouncers to monitor the churchyard passageways nothing short of ludicrous (Kentish Express July 29, 2010).
As I wrote in the letters page in September 2009, the Conservative administration of Ashford Borough Council failed to support proposals for further street lighting or CCTV and furthermore have failed to respond fully to a petition submitted for better security measures in the churchyard in 2008.
This ongoing saga may make good news fodder, but the suffering of Jeremy Adby and co-residents is beyond a joke. As the Kentish Express states, residents had a meeting in March and only at the end of July to the Council decide to put into new street lights.
Employing bouncers is simply ridiculous when a quarter of our council tax money goes to policing the Borough. When the council can spend vast amounts of money on street lighting, consultants to discuss parking in a shared space and swimming facilities that are not usable for residents, one has to wonder how the budget is managed.
Kind regards,
Kelly-Marie Blundell
Ashford Liberal Democrats
Kennington
Now Notorious rather than Famous: Ashford's Shared Space
The shared space has become a laughing stock with the introduction of parking restrictions on Bank Street (Kentish Express 29 July 2010).
The shared space, where people are meant to be able to walk, drive and cycle is now subject to (a) pedestrian crossings, (b) parking spaces, (c) pedestrian walkway allocation, (d) bus lanes and (e) cycle lanes, The only thing that it appears to be lacking to make it a road is dividing lines at the centre.
Far from being a famous landmark, residents of Ashford now considered a shared space to be a notorious waste of money, time and resources by the borough council.
Perhaps with Sir Terry Farrell's desired implementation of an entire ring-road of “shared space”, we can fully embrace the renaming of public spaces to do exactly what the previous public spaces did in the first place. Alongside, of course, designed superseding functionality.
The shared space, where people are meant to be able to walk, drive and cycle is now subject to (a) pedestrian crossings, (b) parking spaces, (c) pedestrian walkway allocation, (d) bus lanes and (e) cycle lanes, The only thing that it appears to be lacking to make it a road is dividing lines at the centre.
Far from being a famous landmark, residents of Ashford now considered a shared space to be a notorious waste of money, time and resources by the borough council.
Perhaps with Sir Terry Farrell's desired implementation of an entire ring-road of “shared space”, we can fully embrace the renaming of public spaces to do exactly what the previous public spaces did in the first place. Alongside, of course, designed superseding functionality.
Older Persons Consultation
Older Persons' care is a bug bear for me.
I tend to think the care provided is significantly lacking for Older People, from Sheltered Accomodation to Care Homes accross the county.
Kent County COuncil is currently consulting on Older Persons Care.
This consultation is open until first of November 2010.
I think the consultation is integral to democratic process and everyone should take the opportunity to think about the needs of older people.
Kent has a significantly ageing demographic, especially around the coastal areas and by 2012 the UK will have more than 50% of people aged 65 or over.
In spite of this, we do not have resident wardens/scheme managers in Sheltered Housing, we have a Primary care Trusts where 60% of the people they treat are Older Persons yet they only commission 25% of Older Persons services and we have a society that generally prefers to ignore older people.
Society is judged by the way in which it treats its older people, and at the moment the level of services allocated to them by public services is nothing short of deplorable.
Everybody has a grandparent or a relative who is likely to need more care in the future. Everyone will become an older person needing more care.
Please exercise your democratic right to comment and probe the main providers of these services, Kent County Council. It's like the lottery, you have to be in it to influence it.
Even if we move to the proposed Big Society Scheme by the Coalition Government, we want to ensure that the bodies that Kent County Council commission to run and maintain the care services for Older People are not driven by the need for profits and margins, is not incentivised or held to account by a bonus culture, but there to provide the care that is needed, wanted and protected to ensure that the human rights of the current residents and the residents to come are protected.
I tend to think the care provided is significantly lacking for Older People, from Sheltered Accomodation to Care Homes accross the county.
Kent County COuncil is currently consulting on Older Persons Care.
This consultation is open until first of November 2010.
I think the consultation is integral to democratic process and everyone should take the opportunity to think about the needs of older people.
Kent has a significantly ageing demographic, especially around the coastal areas and by 2012 the UK will have more than 50% of people aged 65 or over.
In spite of this, we do not have resident wardens/scheme managers in Sheltered Housing, we have a Primary care Trusts where 60% of the people they treat are Older Persons yet they only commission 25% of Older Persons services and we have a society that generally prefers to ignore older people.
Society is judged by the way in which it treats its older people, and at the moment the level of services allocated to them by public services is nothing short of deplorable.
Everybody has a grandparent or a relative who is likely to need more care in the future. Everyone will become an older person needing more care.
Please exercise your democratic right to comment and probe the main providers of these services, Kent County Council. It's like the lottery, you have to be in it to influence it.
Even if we move to the proposed Big Society Scheme by the Coalition Government, we want to ensure that the bodies that Kent County Council commission to run and maintain the care services for Older People are not driven by the need for profits and margins, is not incentivised or held to account by a bonus culture, but there to provide the care that is needed, wanted and protected to ensure that the human rights of the current residents and the residents to come are protected.
Sunday 25 July 2010
Open Letter: Removal of Skating Facilities
Dear Sirs,
The closing down of the skateboarding site on Tannery Lane must come as a disappointment to many young residents.
The site forms part of core activities for youth engagement in Ashford that do not involve paying to enter, and has played a significant part in reducing perceived youth antisocial behaviour In the town.
It is clear that the closing down is due to some form of health and safety issue, and I hope that such a descision does not form part of the over-zealous health and safety culture seen nationwide. Alongside issues with restoring Victoria Park playing facilities, we are in danger of telling children they must not run in case they hurt themselves.
Ashford are seeing a significant reduction in recreational facilities for residents for the summer as it is, with the Stour Centre on limited availablity.
The far larger risk with the the reduction of access to free resources is the young people will utilise other, potentially dangerous sights to skate and experiement with parkour such as the town centre.
Yours faithfully
Kelly-Marie Blundell
Ashford Liberal Democrats
The closing down of the skateboarding site on Tannery Lane must come as a disappointment to many young residents.
The site forms part of core activities for youth engagement in Ashford that do not involve paying to enter, and has played a significant part in reducing perceived youth antisocial behaviour In the town.
It is clear that the closing down is due to some form of health and safety issue, and I hope that such a descision does not form part of the over-zealous health and safety culture seen nationwide. Alongside issues with restoring Victoria Park playing facilities, we are in danger of telling children they must not run in case they hurt themselves.
Ashford are seeing a significant reduction in recreational facilities for residents for the summer as it is, with the Stour Centre on limited availablity.
The far larger risk with the the reduction of access to free resources is the young people will utilise other, potentially dangerous sights to skate and experiement with parkour such as the town centre.
Yours faithfully
Kelly-Marie Blundell
Ashford Liberal Democrats
Open Letter: State of the Borough Debate
Dear Sirs,
I was concerned to read that the Ashford Borough Council Executive have decided that the “State of the Borough Debate” is no longer needed (Kentish Express, 22nd July 2010).
At a time when residents are so concerned about potential planning developments that additional seating needs to be provided at council meetings, the comments that not enough people attend seems invalid.
While only 40 people were able to attend last year, Ashford Borough Council cannot deny that they received so many submissions for questions, they were forced to limit the number heard to 25.
In spite of the decision to remove the debate, it is still currently listed on the council website. I find it saddening that the local government do not have the same faith in democracy that their national counterparts hold, and as a result they are not prepared to listen to genuine concerns and encourage debate and community engagement.
Planning is not the only issue that residents in Ashford are concerned about, but the decision to delay Ashford Futures proposed development plans until September would ensure a good attendance at the November debate, not to mention the ongoing dispute with antisocial behaviour, fly tipping and inadequate waste collection and appropriate allocation of public funded resources.
I hope that the Kentish Express will campaign to return this debate to Ashford Borough Council as my local party will be.
Yours faithfully
Kelly-Marie Blundell
Ashford Liberal Democrats
I was concerned to read that the Ashford Borough Council Executive have decided that the “State of the Borough Debate” is no longer needed (Kentish Express, 22nd July 2010).
At a time when residents are so concerned about potential planning developments that additional seating needs to be provided at council meetings, the comments that not enough people attend seems invalid.
While only 40 people were able to attend last year, Ashford Borough Council cannot deny that they received so many submissions for questions, they were forced to limit the number heard to 25.
In spite of the decision to remove the debate, it is still currently listed on the council website. I find it saddening that the local government do not have the same faith in democracy that their national counterparts hold, and as a result they are not prepared to listen to genuine concerns and encourage debate and community engagement.
Planning is not the only issue that residents in Ashford are concerned about, but the decision to delay Ashford Futures proposed development plans until September would ensure a good attendance at the November debate, not to mention the ongoing dispute with antisocial behaviour, fly tipping and inadequate waste collection and appropriate allocation of public funded resources.
I hope that the Kentish Express will campaign to return this debate to Ashford Borough Council as my local party will be.
Yours faithfully
Kelly-Marie Blundell
Ashford Liberal Democrats
Sunday 4 July 2010
Open Letter: Save Our Courts
Dear Sir
The Kentish Express this week identifies the proposed public sector saving cuts leave Ashford Magistrate Court and Ashford County court are threatened with closure.
In making the decisions as to what courts to close, it is likely that government will consider that the lack of custody suite is reasonable justification. This is because it will save money and demand on police and court staff time by simply using courts which already have immediate access from police cells.
Before the closure of Ashford Police Station's Custody suite, people who warned that this would lead to the closure of the magistrates court where accused of scaremongering.
we are now at risk of not only losing significant resources for community policing and community safety, but also the resources to prosecute those criminals. This is likely to lower people's feelings of safety within the borough on the whole not to mention their faith in announcements made by public services.
Assurances were made by Kent Police that the custody suite loss would not lead to the losing of the Magistrates Court. However, whether disingenuous or simply an unfortunate coincidence, this is likely to have a direct impact on whether Ashford can sustain the Magistrate Court.
We have already seen significant job losses as a result of the movement of the custody suite, and now we face more along with the double-edged sword of risks to public safety.
To lose the County Court would also be a significant blow to Ashford. This undermines the principles of Civil Law by denying those the opportunity to seek recompense and justice at a convenient location. Travelling to Canterbury County Court, where it is a significant difference from the West station and with no direct bus route, would not make it easy for people to pursue litigation.
I wholeheartedly support the Kentish Express campaign to Save Our Courts, but I am concerned that their fate is already sealed by past decisions.
Kind regards
--
Kelly-Marie Blundell
Ashford Liberal Democrats
Kennington
The Kentish Express this week identifies the proposed public sector saving cuts leave Ashford Magistrate Court and Ashford County court are threatened with closure.
In making the decisions as to what courts to close, it is likely that government will consider that the lack of custody suite is reasonable justification. This is because it will save money and demand on police and court staff time by simply using courts which already have immediate access from police cells.
Before the closure of Ashford Police Station's Custody suite, people who warned that this would lead to the closure of the magistrates court where accused of scaremongering.
we are now at risk of not only losing significant resources for community policing and community safety, but also the resources to prosecute those criminals. This is likely to lower people's feelings of safety within the borough on the whole not to mention their faith in announcements made by public services.
Assurances were made by Kent Police that the custody suite loss would not lead to the losing of the Magistrates Court. However, whether disingenuous or simply an unfortunate coincidence, this is likely to have a direct impact on whether Ashford can sustain the Magistrate Court.
We have already seen significant job losses as a result of the movement of the custody suite, and now we face more along with the double-edged sword of risks to public safety.
To lose the County Court would also be a significant blow to Ashford. This undermines the principles of Civil Law by denying those the opportunity to seek recompense and justice at a convenient location. Travelling to Canterbury County Court, where it is a significant difference from the West station and with no direct bus route, would not make it easy for people to pursue litigation.
I wholeheartedly support the Kentish Express campaign to Save Our Courts, but I am concerned that their fate is already sealed by past decisions.
Kind regards
--
Kelly-Marie Blundell
Ashford Liberal Democrats
Kennington
Ashford to Bear Weight of Criminal Justice Cuts
The Kentish Express this week identifies the proposed public sector saving cuts leave Ashford Magistrate Court and Ashford County court are threatened with closure.
In making the decisions as to what courts to close, it is likely that government will consider That the lack of custody suite is reasonable justification. This is because it will save money and demand on police and court staff time by simply using courts which already have immediate access from police cells.
Before the closure of Ashford Police Station's Custody suite, people who warned that this would lead to the closure of the magistrates court where accused of scaremongering.
Now, those of us who were accused of being cynical look on as proposals to close Ashford Magistrate Court gets underway.
Further Implications of the Closure of Custody Suite
As well as losing the jobs of those recruited to manage the custody suite, further jobs have been transferred to Folkestone within the Criminal Justice Unit as case working staff cannot work at such a distance.
One has to ask what is the cost to the public sector of paying both redeployee fees to those staff no longer needed within the police service, as well as travel fees for those relocated.
If spending cuts as proposed in the budget must be so severe, perhaps challenging current decisions to chop up and move around public services should be done in the first instance with the schedule of future losses, as would be normal in the private sector.
To narrow the argument, it can be seen as the least 60 jobs will have now gone from Ashford police station, to be followed by the staff of the magistrate court and potentially the County Court.
Therefore residents in Ashford lose both employment opportunities and public protection.
I do not wish to see this happen, and if you do not either, please take part in the consultation.
Portfolio Holder Councillor Michael Claughton is quoted as saying Communities must come first. Why did he not campaign in the first instance to prevent the removal of both the custody suite and the levels of community policing in Ashford town centre?
In making the decisions as to what courts to close, it is likely that government will consider That the lack of custody suite is reasonable justification. This is because it will save money and demand on police and court staff time by simply using courts which already have immediate access from police cells.
Before the closure of Ashford Police Station's Custody suite, people who warned that this would lead to the closure of the magistrates court where accused of scaremongering.
Now, those of us who were accused of being cynical look on as proposals to close Ashford Magistrate Court gets underway.
Further Implications of the Closure of Custody Suite
As well as losing the jobs of those recruited to manage the custody suite, further jobs have been transferred to Folkestone within the Criminal Justice Unit as case working staff cannot work at such a distance.
One has to ask what is the cost to the public sector of paying both redeployee fees to those staff no longer needed within the police service, as well as travel fees for those relocated.
If spending cuts as proposed in the budget must be so severe, perhaps challenging current decisions to chop up and move around public services should be done in the first instance with the schedule of future losses, as would be normal in the private sector.
To narrow the argument, it can be seen as the least 60 jobs will have now gone from Ashford police station, to be followed by the staff of the magistrate court and potentially the County Court.
Therefore residents in Ashford lose both employment opportunities and public protection.
I do not wish to see this happen, and if you do not either, please take part in the consultation.
Portfolio Holder Councillor Michael Claughton is quoted as saying Communities must come first. Why did he not campaign in the first instance to prevent the removal of both the custody suite and the levels of community policing in Ashford town centre?
The Potential Real Cost of the Development of St Mary's Church
This week's Nuts and Bolt column in the Kentish Express identifies feckless fly tipping in the churchyard in the town centre.
The disposal of a post-modern pink Christmas tree may amuse people, but the implications are more wide reaching.
While the Church of England has agreed to the development may go ahead and will fund the disinterring of the graves, if residents cannot respect both the integrity of the graveyard or the residents who suffer from regular antisocial behaviour, in the surrounding area,one must ask if they will ever respect or act responsibly towards the proposed development.
As the column identifies, equipment and work will be impossible to protect from the three fair of rowdy weekend revellers who already cause much distress in this area.
Is the development of the Church worth (in addition to the proposed spending plan of one million) the legal costs of people suing for falling down holes, or the cost of security guards to patrol the area?
The disposal of a post-modern pink Christmas tree may amuse people, but the implications are more wide reaching.
While the Church of England has agreed to the development may go ahead and will fund the disinterring of the graves, if residents cannot respect both the integrity of the graveyard or the residents who suffer from regular antisocial behaviour, in the surrounding area,one must ask if they will ever respect or act responsibly towards the proposed development.
As the column identifies, equipment and work will be impossible to protect from the three fair of rowdy weekend revellers who already cause much distress in this area.
Is the development of the Church worth (in addition to the proposed spending plan of one million) the legal costs of people suing for falling down holes, or the cost of security guards to patrol the area?
Open Letter: Sir Terry Farrell's Proposed Design Plans for Ashford
Dear Sirs,
Sir Terry Farrell's presentation for Ashford cites transport as being at the “heart of vision for the future” (Your Ashford, June 9th 2010).
The architect may wish to more fully understand Ashford's heritage before he decides on railway being the single most important piece of Ashford's history.
The railway was introduced to Ashford in 1842, while the Tenterden and Rolvenden of Kent and Sussex railway was established later in 1900. If Railway was so integral to Ashford's heritage, then why was it not also designated a National Heritage site?
Sir Terry Farrell also fails to address the true heritage of the town, the Market, which was established in 1600. In spite of this, previous perpetrators of “design excellence” moved the integral market to a flood plane in the 1990s and the street market has suffered significant erosion in the last two decades.
The site of the true heritage of Ashford is now being sold to developers for housing, in spite of Ashford Borough Council promising when the market was relocated in the 90s that the space would not be used for housing.
Residents now find the land being sold between the town centre and Victoria Park which will further separate the residential communities from shopping and the ubiquitous traffic facilities Sir Terry is so keen to highlight and implement.
I would be happier to see a developer focusing on the needs of the communities in Ashford and the usefulness of design, with sensible traffic infrastructure and more jobs, community facilities and events than another concrete wilderness.
Yours faithfully,
Kelly-Marie Blundell
Ashford Liberal Democrats
Kennington
Sir Terry Farrell's presentation for Ashford cites transport as being at the “heart of vision for the future” (Your Ashford, June 9th 2010).
The architect may wish to more fully understand Ashford's heritage before he decides on railway being the single most important piece of Ashford's history.
The railway was introduced to Ashford in 1842, while the Tenterden and Rolvenden of Kent and Sussex railway was established later in 1900. If Railway was so integral to Ashford's heritage, then why was it not also designated a National Heritage site?
Sir Terry Farrell also fails to address the true heritage of the town, the Market, which was established in 1600. In spite of this, previous perpetrators of “design excellence” moved the integral market to a flood plane in the 1990s and the street market has suffered significant erosion in the last two decades.
The site of the true heritage of Ashford is now being sold to developers for housing, in spite of Ashford Borough Council promising when the market was relocated in the 90s that the space would not be used for housing.
Residents now find the land being sold between the town centre and Victoria Park which will further separate the residential communities from shopping and the ubiquitous traffic facilities Sir Terry is so keen to highlight and implement.
I would be happier to see a developer focusing on the needs of the communities in Ashford and the usefulness of design, with sensible traffic infrastructure and more jobs, community facilities and events than another concrete wilderness.
Yours faithfully,
Kelly-Marie Blundell
Ashford Liberal Democrats
Kennington
Bybrook Supermarket Expansion
The Kentish Express (July 1st) details plans to double the size of Sainsbury in Bybrook.
Warren Business Side has suffered a since the move of other large stores such as Curry's to locations closer to the town centre. However, it is still an integral supermarket link for residents of Bybrook for their weekly shopping and petrol supplies.
My initial response when I saw that it was going to expand was to think, fantastic, perhaps they can sort out the parking.
One thing that has always irritated me when visiting Sainsbury is that the parking of the structure lacks direction with the random cones and sleeping policeman attempting to control the flow of traffic in some form of Serpentine towards the store.
However, it seems that in spite of doubling the size of the store and potentially demolishing the two buildings next to Sainsbury's, parking will only increase by 51 spaces. Confusingly, 47 of these will be for disabled drivers and 31 for parents and children.
Therefore, rather than gaining 51 spaces, the site will actually be losing 17 spaces.
Indeed, as anyone who visits the store past 10 pm or prior to 6 am knows, is significantly limited by the number of Lorries parking there for a nap rather than pay ludicrous fees at junction 10.
Whether or not the parking layout will be addressed is not mentioned in the article, but as we can assume, as the store will stay open, this will not happen.
Warren Business Side has suffered a since the move of other large stores such as Curry's to locations closer to the town centre. However, it is still an integral supermarket link for residents of Bybrook for their weekly shopping and petrol supplies.
My initial response when I saw that it was going to expand was to think, fantastic, perhaps they can sort out the parking.
One thing that has always irritated me when visiting Sainsbury is that the parking of the structure lacks direction with the random cones and sleeping policeman attempting to control the flow of traffic in some form of Serpentine towards the store.
However, it seems that in spite of doubling the size of the store and potentially demolishing the two buildings next to Sainsbury's, parking will only increase by 51 spaces. Confusingly, 47 of these will be for disabled drivers and 31 for parents and children.
Therefore, rather than gaining 51 spaces, the site will actually be losing 17 spaces.
Indeed, as anyone who visits the store past 10 pm or prior to 6 am knows, is significantly limited by the number of Lorries parking there for a nap rather than pay ludicrous fees at junction 10.
Whether or not the parking layout will be addressed is not mentioned in the article, but as we can assume, as the store will stay open, this will not happen.
Sunday 20 June 2010
Bybrook Barn's Response to Planning
Following the decision to allow Tescos Planning permission to build a Dobbies Garden Centre, there has been much public and private debate.
The MD of Bybrook Garden Centre, Terry Burch, contacted me with the letter that the newspapers refused to print:
Bybrook Barn Garden Centre’s response to Tesco/Dobbies Planning Approval
By Mr T.B.Burch Owner and MD
I was not completely surprised at the council’s decision on May 26th to vote in favour of Tesco/Dobbies it was never going to be a level playing field. Ashford Borough Council planning officers were determined to push in favour of Tescos/Dobbies.
But by how far?
For years they have been in discussion regarding this site yet we were never informed of the proposal or given the chance to comment although we were the principle people to be affected.
We were not even given the normal courtesy of notification that a planning application had been received. Even when the plans had been approved by Ashford Planners we were never notified and were only made aware of it in a Council magazine as an already agreed project, with the site already mapped out, as a done deal, before a planning meeting had even taken place. To add insult to injury we did not even warrant being officially notified as we were informed as being outside the normal notification area. Something here certainly didn’t seem right.
At the first planning meeting on 31st March, Councillors on the planning committee voted to refuse the Planning Application, and a measure of confidence returned. However it would appear the planners had other views and waved this decision to give councillors the opportunity to change their minds, how convenient. We all were under the elusion that a refusal meant a refusal. Minutes from this meeting are almost non-existent.
Two months later at the second planning meeting on 26th May 2010 the situation had radically changed. The entire local councillors on the planning committee, now unanimously approved Tesco/Dobbies application. Not one had the courage of their previous conviction. Not one councillor, stuck to their original decision with the exception of councillor Claughton, a ward member, and therefore, not eligible to vote, He could not understand why every councillor had changed their original decision, even though no additional information had been provided, stating he wanted no part of it.
Was I disappointed, yes, but this was always a possibility, In a conflict with a tank and a mini, don’t be surprised at the outcome, but disappointed because the local planning councillors, who I had expected would have given us just a little support and backing did a complete U turn and melted away like snow in the desert. Not one was prepared to uphold their previous conviction and stand their ground, using feeble reasons for their reversal and putting a local business in jeopardy.
Many of the reasons Ashford planners had used in the past to refuse us planning applications, no longer seemed to apply.
Planner’s could have redirected Tesco/Dobbies elsewhere in Ashford and kept the site for its original planned use as Leisure, not retail. Tesco/Dobbies will be the only retailer on the site.
This reveals a surprising lack of support to long-standing local businesses, or public opinion, which they felt warranted little or no consideration. How easy it is to hide behind, and fit planning regulations to suit the occasion.
ABC Planner’s lack of being forthright and upfront over these negotiations adequately prove the point.
During the second meeting a pink paper was circulated to all those on the planning committee. Members were told that if they wished to discuss anything in this paper, the public and press would have to leave the chamber in order for this discussion to take place.
I have since been reliably informed that the pink paper from the planners, warned the councillors that if they voted for a refusal, to this application the council could be liable for costs of up to £100,000 should Tesco/Dobbies appeal. Why I wonder?
It would appear that money determines what is passed, or not
In view of the above, the planning committee’s position becomes understandable they were virtually told how to vote.
Is this what our democracy has come to? Don’t vote according to your views as it might cost the council money, this is surely not what the public expect, from councillors they have voted for, to represent their views? We would have accepted losing had it been decided in a fair and democratic manner, and all the issues fairly debated, but this has a very unhealthy odour about it. How many other planning decisions have been conducted in this manner.
These matters surely warrant a more explicit explanation.
We are not adverse to competition, fair competition.
But if one thinks a ten million (£10,000,000) development on our doorstep will have no effect on us, you’re not living in the real world, just take a good look at the strangling effect the same organisation has on the high Streets. An organisation retailing the same products as the Garden Centre, on our doorstep, will be a massive blow, especially when you consider the power and size of the parent company. (Read the book Tescopoly by Andrew Simms) and you may agree with us.
Tesco the parent Company takes £1 for every £8 spent by the British shopper and its share is rising, and we take seriously the comment by the companies chief executive, that he’s not joking, when he says, that still leaves the other seven to go for. They are Britain’s biggest retailer, not just the country’s biggest supermarket, but it’s biggest for everything that’s non food as well.
Having dominated almost every town’s high street in the country, Tesco/Dobbies are now eyeing Garden Centres, with 25 already and seeking a further 100.
You independent friends in the garden centre business need to watch out. Tesco/Dobbies are coming, but if your local council is anything like ours don’t rely on it for support.
It seems preference is given to a multi national retailer, so close to an existing 35 year old loyal Ashford business jeopardising it’s existence with little or no consideration. A Multi-national who have no real commitment to Ashford.
As seems inevitable, when all the small independent businesses disappear the powers that be might, just might, regret being led up the garden path.
Readers can make up their own minds what constitutes fair. Maybe fair in planning terms no longer exists or counts for much.
I finish by saying how extremely proud I am of my staff for their help and loyal support, and know they will face this next challenge with vigour and determination.
I also thank all of our customer friends for their continuing support
There are too many to thank individually but please take this as my personal Thank you!
Terry Burch
Managing Director
Bybrook Barn Garden Centre
The MD of Bybrook Garden Centre, Terry Burch, contacted me with the letter that the newspapers refused to print:
Bybrook Barn Garden Centre’s response to Tesco/Dobbies Planning Approval
By Mr T.B.Burch Owner and MD
I was not completely surprised at the council’s decision on May 26th to vote in favour of Tesco/Dobbies it was never going to be a level playing field. Ashford Borough Council planning officers were determined to push in favour of Tescos/Dobbies.
But by how far?
For years they have been in discussion regarding this site yet we were never informed of the proposal or given the chance to comment although we were the principle people to be affected.
We were not even given the normal courtesy of notification that a planning application had been received. Even when the plans had been approved by Ashford Planners we were never notified and were only made aware of it in a Council magazine as an already agreed project, with the site already mapped out, as a done deal, before a planning meeting had even taken place. To add insult to injury we did not even warrant being officially notified as we were informed as being outside the normal notification area. Something here certainly didn’t seem right.
At the first planning meeting on 31st March, Councillors on the planning committee voted to refuse the Planning Application, and a measure of confidence returned. However it would appear the planners had other views and waved this decision to give councillors the opportunity to change their minds, how convenient. We all were under the elusion that a refusal meant a refusal. Minutes from this meeting are almost non-existent.
Two months later at the second planning meeting on 26th May 2010 the situation had radically changed. The entire local councillors on the planning committee, now unanimously approved Tesco/Dobbies application. Not one had the courage of their previous conviction. Not one councillor, stuck to their original decision with the exception of councillor Claughton, a ward member, and therefore, not eligible to vote, He could not understand why every councillor had changed their original decision, even though no additional information had been provided, stating he wanted no part of it.
Was I disappointed, yes, but this was always a possibility, In a conflict with a tank and a mini, don’t be surprised at the outcome, but disappointed because the local planning councillors, who I had expected would have given us just a little support and backing did a complete U turn and melted away like snow in the desert. Not one was prepared to uphold their previous conviction and stand their ground, using feeble reasons for their reversal and putting a local business in jeopardy.
Many of the reasons Ashford planners had used in the past to refuse us planning applications, no longer seemed to apply.
Planner’s could have redirected Tesco/Dobbies elsewhere in Ashford and kept the site for its original planned use as Leisure, not retail. Tesco/Dobbies will be the only retailer on the site.
This reveals a surprising lack of support to long-standing local businesses, or public opinion, which they felt warranted little or no consideration. How easy it is to hide behind, and fit planning regulations to suit the occasion.
ABC Planner’s lack of being forthright and upfront over these negotiations adequately prove the point.
During the second meeting a pink paper was circulated to all those on the planning committee. Members were told that if they wished to discuss anything in this paper, the public and press would have to leave the chamber in order for this discussion to take place.
I have since been reliably informed that the pink paper from the planners, warned the councillors that if they voted for a refusal, to this application the council could be liable for costs of up to £100,000 should Tesco/Dobbies appeal. Why I wonder?
It would appear that money determines what is passed, or not
In view of the above, the planning committee’s position becomes understandable they were virtually told how to vote.
Is this what our democracy has come to? Don’t vote according to your views as it might cost the council money, this is surely not what the public expect, from councillors they have voted for, to represent their views? We would have accepted losing had it been decided in a fair and democratic manner, and all the issues fairly debated, but this has a very unhealthy odour about it. How many other planning decisions have been conducted in this manner.
These matters surely warrant a more explicit explanation.
We are not adverse to competition, fair competition.
But if one thinks a ten million (£10,000,000) development on our doorstep will have no effect on us, you’re not living in the real world, just take a good look at the strangling effect the same organisation has on the high Streets. An organisation retailing the same products as the Garden Centre, on our doorstep, will be a massive blow, especially when you consider the power and size of the parent company. (Read the book Tescopoly by Andrew Simms) and you may agree with us.
Tesco the parent Company takes £1 for every £8 spent by the British shopper and its share is rising, and we take seriously the comment by the companies chief executive, that he’s not joking, when he says, that still leaves the other seven to go for. They are Britain’s biggest retailer, not just the country’s biggest supermarket, but it’s biggest for everything that’s non food as well.
Having dominated almost every town’s high street in the country, Tesco/Dobbies are now eyeing Garden Centres, with 25 already and seeking a further 100.
You independent friends in the garden centre business need to watch out. Tesco/Dobbies are coming, but if your local council is anything like ours don’t rely on it for support.
It seems preference is given to a multi national retailer, so close to an existing 35 year old loyal Ashford business jeopardising it’s existence with little or no consideration. A Multi-national who have no real commitment to Ashford.
As seems inevitable, when all the small independent businesses disappear the powers that be might, just might, regret being led up the garden path.
Readers can make up their own minds what constitutes fair. Maybe fair in planning terms no longer exists or counts for much.
I finish by saying how extremely proud I am of my staff for their help and loyal support, and know they will face this next challenge with vigour and determination.
I also thank all of our customer friends for their continuing support
There are too many to thank individually but please take this as my personal Thank you!
Terry Burch
Managing Director
Bybrook Barn Garden Centre
Monday 31 May 2010
Open Letter: Approval of Dobbies Leisure Garden Centre
Dear Sir or Madam,
The decision made at Ashford Borough Council Planning meeting to approve the introduction of a Dobbies Garden Centre on Eureka Park was disappointing to say the least.
While there was a number of objections raised regarding the issues of competition, which are not considered to be a planning issue, there was still the issue of changing the designation Of the building in question. This area was designated office space and neither retail more leisure. In the event that this designation was to be overridden, it should have at least been designated leisure space.
To designate the land as “retail use” signifies that the parent company, Tesco, may at any time change the Dobbies to a Tesco supermarket without consulting the public or the council. There are already significant legislative guidelines on allowing monopoly by Tesco across Europe and our councillors have just effectively let them in through the back door.
The ability of the planning committee to override the designation of the building in spite of significant public opinion against the idea, as well as against the principle and purpose of the Eureka Park, raises serious questions About the principle and purpose of our Borough Council.
Public Services should be for the public, run by people that are elected by the public, In order to facilitate the use of the town. When Eureka park was designed, It was intended to be a site dedicated to scientific technology and development to increase jobs and prospects for both the local borough and the country.
However, by introducing a Garden Leisure Centre, as Dobbies is meant to be, we are simply introducing further low paid low-grade jobs and not developing the economic climate of Ashford in the slightest.
Kind regards
Kelly-Marie Blundell
The decision made at Ashford Borough Council Planning meeting to approve the introduction of a Dobbies Garden Centre on Eureka Park was disappointing to say the least.
While there was a number of objections raised regarding the issues of competition, which are not considered to be a planning issue, there was still the issue of changing the designation Of the building in question. This area was designated office space and neither retail more leisure. In the event that this designation was to be overridden, it should have at least been designated leisure space.
To designate the land as “retail use” signifies that the parent company, Tesco, may at any time change the Dobbies to a Tesco supermarket without consulting the public or the council. There are already significant legislative guidelines on allowing monopoly by Tesco across Europe and our councillors have just effectively let them in through the back door.
The ability of the planning committee to override the designation of the building in spite of significant public opinion against the idea, as well as against the principle and purpose of the Eureka Park, raises serious questions About the principle and purpose of our Borough Council.
Public Services should be for the public, run by people that are elected by the public, In order to facilitate the use of the town. When Eureka park was designed, It was intended to be a site dedicated to scientific technology and development to increase jobs and prospects for both the local borough and the country.
However, by introducing a Garden Leisure Centre, as Dobbies is meant to be, we are simply introducing further low paid low-grade jobs and not developing the economic climate of Ashford in the slightest.
Kind regards
Kelly-Marie Blundell
Open Letter: Street Pastors
Dear Sir or Madame,
While I have been saddened to follow the murder trial on behalf of the victim Ben Neilson, and would like to send my regards to his family, the idea of the introduction of Street Pastors Raises serious concerns.
We already have a significant network of Community Safety Specialists in Ashford. This includes Police Officers, Police Community Support Officers, Community Wardens and Community Forums. In spite of this, Ashford has one of the highest levels of Antisocial behaviour in the country.
The continuous issues regarding the Churchyard are indicative of this. Because of this, I am confused as to what the Street Pastors will be able to bring, where police and other Community Safety Specialists are failing.
In addition to this, like a lot of the network of Community Safety Specialists, the Street Pastors will not have any powers in order to act against crime or protect themselves or others.
The scheme may inadvertently create additional targets of violent behaviour which will put not only the Street Pastors but also members of the public as a higher risk.
We are still awaiting proposals by Ashford Borough Council to make the town centre an alcohol free zone during the evenings. I would hope that Ashford Borough Council do not anticipate utilising volunteer Street Pastors to maintain this regulation.
Kind regards,
Kelly-Marie Blundell
While I have been saddened to follow the murder trial on behalf of the victim Ben Neilson, and would like to send my regards to his family, the idea of the introduction of Street Pastors Raises serious concerns.
We already have a significant network of Community Safety Specialists in Ashford. This includes Police Officers, Police Community Support Officers, Community Wardens and Community Forums. In spite of this, Ashford has one of the highest levels of Antisocial behaviour in the country.
The continuous issues regarding the Churchyard are indicative of this. Because of this, I am confused as to what the Street Pastors will be able to bring, where police and other Community Safety Specialists are failing.
In addition to this, like a lot of the network of Community Safety Specialists, the Street Pastors will not have any powers in order to act against crime or protect themselves or others.
The scheme may inadvertently create additional targets of violent behaviour which will put not only the Street Pastors but also members of the public as a higher risk.
We are still awaiting proposals by Ashford Borough Council to make the town centre an alcohol free zone during the evenings. I would hope that Ashford Borough Council do not anticipate utilising volunteer Street Pastors to maintain this regulation.
Kind regards,
Kelly-Marie Blundell
Sunday 9 May 2010
Rather Engaged
Just a note to apologise for my lack of bloggery.
The election has kept me more than busy, and the ongoing debates between Lib Dems and other parties is something of a touchy subject.
However, on top of that, I'm doing something rather shocking and conventional, getting married. On Saturday 15th May 2010.
I do intend to blog on the length and brevity of the election, liberally littered with philosophising on what exciting times these are, just not today!
The election has kept me more than busy, and the ongoing debates between Lib Dems and other parties is something of a touchy subject.
However, on top of that, I'm doing something rather shocking and conventional, getting married. On Saturday 15th May 2010.
I do intend to blog on the length and brevity of the election, liberally littered with philosophising on what exciting times these are, just not today!
Sunday 18 April 2010
Winning in Ashford, Kent
My blogging seems to have depleted rapidly since the beginning of the election campaign.
As the agent for our candidate for Ashford and Tenterden constituency said to me "Vince Cable’s book “Free Radical” describes wild optimism as “candidatitis”."
It's absolutely fantastic to get carried away with the election hype.
With the phenomenal success that the Liberal Democrats are now showing in the polls and the support being referred to by Andrew Marr is the "Clegg Effect", I think that probably every member of the Liberal Democrats is suffering from slight candidatitis.
In the last couple of days, when I've got home from work, I've been canvassing my local ward and getting into wonderful discussions about what the Liberal Democrats can do for Ashford and the local area.
Quite simply, people are sick of more of the same, 65 years of the government, elected by tidal voting, booms and busts in the economy, booms and busts in the job market and something of management of cartels through running public services.
For once, people are genuinely engaged with the political climate in this country.
They are genuinely interested in alternative methods of government, voting, ways of managing the economy, the job market and public services as well as looking to embrace a far more democratic and liberal system than we are currently experiencing.
My weekends have been spent knocking on doors or leafleting the town centre. wonderful discussions I had yesterday, and I had so many positive phrases such as "preaching to the converted", "I was so impressed with Clegg on Thursday" and "don't worry, you've got my vote".
Our opposition, the Conservative candidate Damian Green, had been campaigning in Dover, which is one of the marginal seats in the county. However, our increased efforts in recent weeks, from hosting a major question and answer and meet the people are bent on the town centre bandstand, leafleting, canvassing and placing major advertisement in the local press has brought Damien back into the constituency.
If you are interested in what the Ashford Liberal Democrats are doing in the local town centre, have a look at some of our Borough councillors, County Councillors or local campaigners.
Chris Took, your Liberal Democrat candidate at this election, has pledged five key areas that he would like to improve in Ashford.
A Fair Deal for Older People
Chris and myself, along with our local party and regional party, have been campaigning for some time to reinstate resident wardens in sheltered accommodation, where residents are currently left vulnerable and available in their own homes.
In addition to this, we are campaigning for a fairer care system, better medical support, financial benefits to lift 40% of pensioners out of poverty and the pension system that reflects national earnings.
A Fair Deal for The Economy
By implementing the Liberal Democrat Policy to raise the current tax bracket to a minimum of £10,000, this would benefit the poorest in society. In areas of deprivation in Ashford, people would be able to save more money by working than they would do on benefits, allowing them to get out of the welfare state trap and live their lives to the full.
In addition to this, people across the constituency would be better off by an average of £700. Capital gains tax would be raised to move in line with average earnings to prevent people from moving all of their earnings into capital gains and paying low taxes on it.
A Fair Deal for Communities
As a passionate campaigner for democratic participation in planning and community development, Chris Took will uphold the right for people for participate in the development of their neighbourhood, from The North School Farm to Bybrook Barn.
A Fair Deal in Ashford's Growth
With a vast expansion underway in Ashford, including the recently approved M20 Junction 10A, Chris Took is dedicated to campaigning for resources and sensible expansion, including more schools, jobs and infrastructure to support the
A Fair Deal for Local Charities and Businesses
The red tape and bureaucracy encompassing business and charity in Ashford prevents both the delivery of services and people being valued. With performance targets for volunteers, the very concept is undermined. Chris is campaigning to strip out the wasted administration and focus on what Businesses and Charities do best.
And for All of You Who Think the Lib Dem Vote is a Wasted Vote...
One of the Liberal Democrats' key policies if we support a Coalition is to introduce Proportional Representation. If you vote for us, we will be able to ensure your vote will count every time.
As the agent for our candidate for Ashford and Tenterden constituency said to me "Vince Cable’s book “Free Radical” describes wild optimism as “candidatitis”."
It's absolutely fantastic to get carried away with the election hype.
With the phenomenal success that the Liberal Democrats are now showing in the polls and the support being referred to by Andrew Marr is the "Clegg Effect", I think that probably every member of the Liberal Democrats is suffering from slight candidatitis.
In the last couple of days, when I've got home from work, I've been canvassing my local ward and getting into wonderful discussions about what the Liberal Democrats can do for Ashford and the local area.
Quite simply, people are sick of more of the same, 65 years of the government, elected by tidal voting, booms and busts in the economy, booms and busts in the job market and something of management of cartels through running public services.
For once, people are genuinely engaged with the political climate in this country.
They are genuinely interested in alternative methods of government, voting, ways of managing the economy, the job market and public services as well as looking to embrace a far more democratic and liberal system than we are currently experiencing.
My weekends have been spent knocking on doors or leafleting the town centre. wonderful discussions I had yesterday, and I had so many positive phrases such as "preaching to the converted", "I was so impressed with Clegg on Thursday" and "don't worry, you've got my vote".
Our opposition, the Conservative candidate Damian Green, had been campaigning in Dover, which is one of the marginal seats in the county. However, our increased efforts in recent weeks, from hosting a major question and answer and meet the people are bent on the town centre bandstand, leafleting, canvassing and placing major advertisement in the local press has brought Damien back into the constituency.
If you are interested in what the Ashford Liberal Democrats are doing in the local town centre, have a look at some of our Borough councillors, County Councillors or local campaigners.
Chris Took, your Liberal Democrat candidate at this election, has pledged five key areas that he would like to improve in Ashford.
A Fair Deal for Older People
Chris and myself, along with our local party and regional party, have been campaigning for some time to reinstate resident wardens in sheltered accommodation, where residents are currently left vulnerable and available in their own homes.
In addition to this, we are campaigning for a fairer care system, better medical support, financial benefits to lift 40% of pensioners out of poverty and the pension system that reflects national earnings.
A Fair Deal for The Economy
By implementing the Liberal Democrat Policy to raise the current tax bracket to a minimum of £10,000, this would benefit the poorest in society. In areas of deprivation in Ashford, people would be able to save more money by working than they would do on benefits, allowing them to get out of the welfare state trap and live their lives to the full.
In addition to this, people across the constituency would be better off by an average of £700. Capital gains tax would be raised to move in line with average earnings to prevent people from moving all of their earnings into capital gains and paying low taxes on it.
A Fair Deal for Communities
As a passionate campaigner for democratic participation in planning and community development, Chris Took will uphold the right for people for participate in the development of their neighbourhood, from The North School Farm to Bybrook Barn.
A Fair Deal in Ashford's Growth
With a vast expansion underway in Ashford, including the recently approved M20 Junction 10A, Chris Took is dedicated to campaigning for resources and sensible expansion, including more schools, jobs and infrastructure to support the
A Fair Deal for Local Charities and Businesses
The red tape and bureaucracy encompassing business and charity in Ashford prevents both the delivery of services and people being valued. With performance targets for volunteers, the very concept is undermined. Chris is campaigning to strip out the wasted administration and focus on what Businesses and Charities do best.
And for All of You Who Think the Lib Dem Vote is a Wasted Vote...
One of the Liberal Democrats' key policies if we support a Coalition is to introduce Proportional Representation. If you vote for us, we will be able to ensure your vote will count every time.
Sunday 11 April 2010
Kentish Support for the Liberal Democrats
With the Royal starter's gun we are off galloping towards the General Election.
Not even a week in and there are online polls, analysis and speculation about the election in Kent.
I was therefore delighted to see that the majority of people reading the Kent Online Kentish Express were talking about voting Liberal Democrat over all other parties.
In response to the election being called, I have had the KM on the 'phone, ABC on the 'phone and other local papers and advertisers. I was quite impressed to have my name featured on the front cover of Your Ashford as Chris's campaign manager
Coverage is meant to be impartial, but we live in a fairly "safe seat" in Ashford and although our campaigning attempts are large, it is often difficult to reach everyone in the constituency.
This is why the Ashford Liberal Democrats decided to make use of the Town Centre Partnership's bandstand this Saturday to communicate with the public and provide a real and tangible presence.
Organisation for this event has been going on for months, and in a period of what can only be described as "electoral flux", we are campaigning to make a real change in Ashford.
Chris Took, the Liberal Democrat Parliamentary candidate, lives in Kennington with his wife and has been campaigning in Kent for many years.
This weekend, Chris came to the bandstand and met many local residents, engaging with them on a level that they have perhaps not received with other local politicians.
Questions included issues surrounding the economy, the NHS, older people using iT and immigration.
Our presence alone has gained as members, volunteers and and more support than we've ever seen before.
We will be in town leafleting in the next three weeks in the run-up to the election as well as out knocking on the doors, delivering leaflets and speaking people is much as possible. If you can spare five minutes or a couple of hours, please contact me and let me know!
Please help join the campaign to bring back a Liberal MP to Ashford, the last of which was seen in 1931!
Not even a week in and there are online polls, analysis and speculation about the election in Kent.
I was therefore delighted to see that the majority of people reading the Kent Online Kentish Express were talking about voting Liberal Democrat over all other parties.
In response to the election being called, I have had the KM on the 'phone, ABC on the 'phone and other local papers and advertisers. I was quite impressed to have my name featured on the front cover of Your Ashford as Chris's campaign manager
Coverage is meant to be impartial, but we live in a fairly "safe seat" in Ashford and although our campaigning attempts are large, it is often difficult to reach everyone in the constituency.
This is why the Ashford Liberal Democrats decided to make use of the Town Centre Partnership's bandstand this Saturday to communicate with the public and provide a real and tangible presence.
Organisation for this event has been going on for months, and in a period of what can only be described as "electoral flux", we are campaigning to make a real change in Ashford.
Chris Took, the Liberal Democrat Parliamentary candidate, lives in Kennington with his wife and has been campaigning in Kent for many years.
This weekend, Chris came to the bandstand and met many local residents, engaging with them on a level that they have perhaps not received with other local politicians.
Questions included issues surrounding the economy, the NHS, older people using iT and immigration.
Our presence alone has gained as members, volunteers and and more support than we've ever seen before.
We will be in town leafleting in the next three weeks in the run-up to the election as well as out knocking on the doors, delivering leaflets and speaking people is much as possible. If you can spare five minutes or a couple of hours, please contact me and let me know!
Please help join the campaign to bring back a Liberal MP to Ashford, the last of which was seen in 1931!
Tuesday 6 April 2010
Open Letter: Future Depends on Skilled Employment in the Town
Dear Sirs,
It would be a delight to see a government department based in Charter House, as it would provide A significant regeneration to Ashford as a whole.
One of the reasons Ashford has not succeeded with regeneration is due to issues with employment resources. Although we live within close proximity of four universities, the job market is very limited in Ashford, and the choice is to commute to another town or indeed to London, or take lower paid, unskilled work in some of the larger corporations in the town.
If Ashford town centre were to attract a larger population of NRS Social Grades C1 and above, including clerical, managerial and professional labour, we would see significant change in the infrastructure within the town centre. Currently there is no “cafe culture” or “restaurant culture” that is so prevalent in nearby cities such as Canterbury.
They would also be able to spend more money in Ashford's large selection of shopping emporiums, invest in the vast amount of housing that is being built and hopefully join the campaigns for more schools, more medical facilities and better community resources.
With a government department here, we would also see a rise in other businesses choosing to locate in Ashford in order to make the most of the talent that would inevitably be here. In addition to this there would be likely to be businesses that support government departments, such as out-contracted stationers, They would also provide additional employment opportunities that would raise the ambition of current residents and bring talented and qualified residents to the area.
Kind regards,
Kelly-Marie Blundell
Ashford Liberal Democrats
Kennington
It would be a delight to see a government department based in Charter House, as it would provide A significant regeneration to Ashford as a whole.
One of the reasons Ashford has not succeeded with regeneration is due to issues with employment resources. Although we live within close proximity of four universities, the job market is very limited in Ashford, and the choice is to commute to another town or indeed to London, or take lower paid, unskilled work in some of the larger corporations in the town.
If Ashford town centre were to attract a larger population of NRS Social Grades C1 and above, including clerical, managerial and professional labour, we would see significant change in the infrastructure within the town centre. Currently there is no “cafe culture” or “restaurant culture” that is so prevalent in nearby cities such as Canterbury.
They would also be able to spend more money in Ashford's large selection of shopping emporiums, invest in the vast amount of housing that is being built and hopefully join the campaigns for more schools, more medical facilities and better community resources.
With a government department here, we would also see a rise in other businesses choosing to locate in Ashford in order to make the most of the talent that would inevitably be here. In addition to this there would be likely to be businesses that support government departments, such as out-contracted stationers, They would also provide additional employment opportunities that would raise the ambition of current residents and bring talented and qualified residents to the area.
Kind regards,
Kelly-Marie Blundell
Ashford Liberal Democrats
Kennington
Open Letter: Pothole Protests
Dear Sirs,
Seeing Ashford featured in The Times and on various online newspapers with regards to Ted Relph's home-made pothole warning signs was extremely amusing.
I certainly think that he should replace the sign within two weeks if the holes have not been fixed to his satisfaction.
I applaud his attempt to get something done about the dire state of the roads in his area, and wonder if perhaps members of the public across Ashford Borough should do the same where ever they have potholes.
Certainly, in my own area, there are some terrible wounds on the road that must be causing significant damage to the heavy amount of traffic that we have in Kennington.
Given that we have recently been informed of a council tax rise, I find it odd that we would require the extra cash boost to help fix roads blighted by potholes.
However, by and district councils are only awarded 25% of the money that they accrue in revenue from council tax. If governments pledged to allow councils to retain 75% of the money accrued, as the Liberal Democrats do, then we wouldn't need to have extra money allocated within the budget.
Kind regards
Kelly-Marie Blundell
Ashford Liberal Democrats
Kennington
Seeing Ashford featured in The Times and on various online newspapers with regards to Ted Relph's home-made pothole warning signs was extremely amusing.
I certainly think that he should replace the sign within two weeks if the holes have not been fixed to his satisfaction.
I applaud his attempt to get something done about the dire state of the roads in his area, and wonder if perhaps members of the public across Ashford Borough should do the same where ever they have potholes.
Certainly, in my own area, there are some terrible wounds on the road that must be causing significant damage to the heavy amount of traffic that we have in Kennington.
Given that we have recently been informed of a council tax rise, I find it odd that we would require the extra cash boost to help fix roads blighted by potholes.
However, by and district councils are only awarded 25% of the money that they accrue in revenue from council tax. If governments pledged to allow councils to retain 75% of the money accrued, as the Liberal Democrats do, then we wouldn't need to have extra money allocated within the budget.
Kind regards
Kelly-Marie Blundell
Ashford Liberal Democrats
Kennington
Open Letter: Is the North School Farm Truely Saved?
Dear Sirs,
While it is a delight that the North School has been “saved”, there are real issues with relocating the farm that will have a significant impact and should be addressed.
There is likely to be a negative effect on not only on the animals but also on the day-to-day running of the school. In addition to this, the relocation will lead to a reduction of the sports fields and have a subsequent impact on the school.
This is on top of the destruction that building houses around the front of the school will have. Not only is Essella Road already a congested T-junction, but the increase of traffic will endanger school children and families in the area both at building time and once the houses are resided in.
Ultimately, when weighing up the issues, I cannot see that this has been a campaign success.
It does appear that Kent County Council are attempting to sell the land to build houses in order to plug the deficit in their own accounts caused by contracting a company at risk. This is their own failing and they should not be effectively taking it out on the school. At the very least the proceeds from selling the land for housing should be more than adequate to relocate the farm effectively, if the development must go through.
There are clearly significant issues of the communications of our councils and Local Education Authorities. Given that the two are essentially the same body, it identifies a huge issue with communications that should be addressed sooner rather than later.
Kind regards,
Kelly-Marie Blundell
Ashford Liberal Democrats
Kennington
While it is a delight that the North School has been “saved”, there are real issues with relocating the farm that will have a significant impact and should be addressed.
There is likely to be a negative effect on not only on the animals but also on the day-to-day running of the school. In addition to this, the relocation will lead to a reduction of the sports fields and have a subsequent impact on the school.
This is on top of the destruction that building houses around the front of the school will have. Not only is Essella Road already a congested T-junction, but the increase of traffic will endanger school children and families in the area both at building time and once the houses are resided in.
Ultimately, when weighing up the issues, I cannot see that this has been a campaign success.
It does appear that Kent County Council are attempting to sell the land to build houses in order to plug the deficit in their own accounts caused by contracting a company at risk. This is their own failing and they should not be effectively taking it out on the school. At the very least the proceeds from selling the land for housing should be more than adequate to relocate the farm effectively, if the development must go through.
There are clearly significant issues of the communications of our councils and Local Education Authorities. Given that the two are essentially the same body, it identifies a huge issue with communications that should be addressed sooner rather than later.
Kind regards,
Kelly-Marie Blundell
Ashford Liberal Democrats
Kennington
Speeding Privileges Should Not be Allowed.
The Kentish Express reports that magistrates in Ashford decided not to prosecute a Serious Organised Crime Agency (SOCA) officer for driving over 49 miles over the speed limit on the M20.
At what point did being an agency police officer excuse you from committing a crime?
While officers on active duty are entitled to breach speed limits in pursuance of that duty, the diabolical that privilege should be extended to driving to work. By the same rationale, doctors, teachers and politicians should all be entitled to drive at Extortionate, life endangering speeds.
In addition to the professionals within civil service, perhaps we should also consider extending this privileged to their administrative support staff, from the receptionists that let them in the door to those that type the minutes of the meetings.
The officer in question was speeding to reach an undercover operation in another county. This operation resulted in convictions of drug trafficking. However, An ambulance driver rushing to work in his own vehicle who subsequently saves the life of someone when he later drives the ambulance there is not entitled to such a privilege, yet could be by this ruling by Ashford Magistrates Court.
This could potentially create a far reaching precedent that would allow any civil service employee to evade conviction when prosecution for that crime exists to protect the public.
The sort of privilege creates ill feeling and a lack of respect to the law that could have devastating effects. Imagine if everyone who was late for work, whether attending a crime scene or simply needing to clock in to pay the bills, decided to drive significantly over the speed limit.
At what point did being an agency police officer excuse you from committing a crime?
While officers on active duty are entitled to breach speed limits in pursuance of that duty, the diabolical that privilege should be extended to driving to work. By the same rationale, doctors, teachers and politicians should all be entitled to drive at Extortionate, life endangering speeds.
In addition to the professionals within civil service, perhaps we should also consider extending this privileged to their administrative support staff, from the receptionists that let them in the door to those that type the minutes of the meetings.
The officer in question was speeding to reach an undercover operation in another county. This operation resulted in convictions of drug trafficking. However, An ambulance driver rushing to work in his own vehicle who subsequently saves the life of someone when he later drives the ambulance there is not entitled to such a privilege, yet could be by this ruling by Ashford Magistrates Court.
This could potentially create a far reaching precedent that would allow any civil service employee to evade conviction when prosecution for that crime exists to protect the public.
The sort of privilege creates ill feeling and a lack of respect to the law that could have devastating effects. Imagine if everyone who was late for work, whether attending a crime scene or simply needing to clock in to pay the bills, decided to drive significantly over the speed limit.
Monday 5 April 2010
A Rundown on the Smaller Stories in the Kentish Express
Hospital Flower Shop Closes
In spite of dismay from local residents, the final commercial shop in the William Harvey Hospital has been closed. The flower shop, run by Anne Epps, had been placed there for over 30 years.
I remember purchasing a blue teddy bear from the venue in 1985 when my little brother was born. He is now 24 and still has that the bear “Bluey”, although the flowers that were also purchased have long since perished!
As a long-standing local business, it is a shame to see it being forced out of a prime location By the need to “modernisation”.
It will be interesting to see what South East Liberal Democrat MEP Sharon Bowles, Chair of the Economic and Monetary Affairs committee makes of the breach competition law Made by the hospital.
Social Services Failures
It is rather shocking to think that Kent, one of the largest counties geographically in the country has a shortage of up to 40% of social workers.
Is even more concerning that Kent Social Services was awarded an accolade of being one of the best services in the country.
However, it is a good thing that there has been an increase in reports of suspected child abuse following the Baby P scandal. This indicates that the high media coverage given to the story has made people think more about their local community and respond to prevent children from being at risk.
By the same measure, there is likely to be a higher uptake by young graduates to the Social Services profession, in order to combat, prevent and help children at risk.
In spite of dismay from local residents, the final commercial shop in the William Harvey Hospital has been closed. The flower shop, run by Anne Epps, had been placed there for over 30 years.
I remember purchasing a blue teddy bear from the venue in 1985 when my little brother was born. He is now 24 and still has that the bear “Bluey”, although the flowers that were also purchased have long since perished!
As a long-standing local business, it is a shame to see it being forced out of a prime location By the need to “modernisation”.
It will be interesting to see what South East Liberal Democrat MEP Sharon Bowles, Chair of the Economic and Monetary Affairs committee makes of the breach competition law Made by the hospital.
Social Services Failures
It is rather shocking to think that Kent, one of the largest counties geographically in the country has a shortage of up to 40% of social workers.
Is even more concerning that Kent Social Services was awarded an accolade of being one of the best services in the country.
However, it is a good thing that there has been an increase in reports of suspected child abuse following the Baby P scandal. This indicates that the high media coverage given to the story has made people think more about their local community and respond to prevent children from being at risk.
By the same measure, there is likely to be a higher uptake by young graduates to the Social Services profession, in order to combat, prevent and help children at risk.
Friday 2 April 2010
Bring On The Pothole Army in Ashford
There is a dramatic rise in the number of potholes in Kent, which have caused a rush of public unhappiness in Ashford.
Members of the public, encouraged by growing local media reports, have began to play signs warning people of the (alleged) phenomena that is the pothole.
When the Kentish Express showed one spoof road sign warning of potholes on its front cover, humour turned the issue into a public united cause.
This has gained such publicity that is featured in The Times
Make Your Own Pothole Road Sign
Take a spare piece of wood, plastic or board and fashion into an equilateral triangle.
Paint the triangle white and give it a bright red border
Add your own choice of logo. Below are some suggestions:
Members of the public, encouraged by growing local media reports, have began to play signs warning people of the (alleged) phenomena that is the pothole.
When the Kentish Express showed one spoof road sign warning of potholes on its front cover, humour turned the issue into a public united cause.
This has gained such publicity that is featured in The Times
Make Your Own Pothole Road Sign
Take a spare piece of wood, plastic or board and fashion into an equilateral triangle.
Paint the triangle white and give it a bright red border
Add your own choice of logo. Below are some suggestions:
Wednesday 31 March 2010
Ashford Future's Waste of Money
Yesterday I attended the Kennington Community Forum and the beginning we were given a presentation demonstrating where the council is spending £450,000 of our council tax money.
Ashford Future and Ashford Borough Council have contacted a not-for-profit company to run a pilot project on energy efficiency.
For "Not-for-profit company", please read "a poor excuse for a charity that feeds directly of government money and exploits the targeting system in the civil service as well as using up some of the hundreds of thousands of graduates without any jobs.
They prepared a presentation with a vast array of free stuff and explain how Ashford Future had commissioned them to look into how to make our homes more energy efficient.
To do this they would be giving away free stuff
Kennington and Bybrook wards have been selected in the pilot study which is to run until October 2010.
This pilot study will involve giving away free stuff
The team offering to conduct two surveys on properties to assess whether energy savings can be made.
From this survey you can get free stuff
This includes the Electricity Monitoring device, which retails at the price of £25. But for you, it will be free.
But Wait, There's More
Our council tax will also be used to supply "chimney balloons", "tap implants", "reflecting radiator panels" and much more.
And if that wasn't enough of a waste of our money, they will also have asales team knocking on doors in the local community to book surveys, and, wait for it,the residents know what free stuff they are entitled to.
In addition to the free stuff, residents will also be able to find out about government subsidised cavity wall insulation, loft insulation and much more.
Don't forget the free stuff!
A Little Less Sarcastic Conclusion
The bare bones of the matter are the council tax is being wasted on yet another ludicrous project by Ashford Future's evasive and illogical partnership.
£450,000 is just the cost of the "free stuff". How much more did the project team, surveyors and consultants cost?
And this is only the pilot study. How much will it cost when it is rolled out across all wards in 2011?
Not to mention the fact that the majority of homeowners are entitled to subsidised energy-saving initiatives without such a gratuitous waste of money.
However, I know from talking to residents, that often the "subsidised part" is the small change. The "approved" companies charge consumers through the nose for the rest, and the government will only subsidise if you have the full amount done.
There are not many pensioners who could afford to pay £3000 to get £1000 of subsidiaries to have their radiators replaced.
I think that's the public services deficit for Mr Brown and Mr Darling to locate.
Failings in Future Planning
There is a significant strategic issue here too.
If companies were filling our town with Lego-brick-houses that cost too much and cost even more ecologically, we wouldn't have to have this retrospective funding in the first place.
The level of development in Ashford is one of the highest in the country, and, despite knowing about Climate change, no one is ensuring that this development consists of sustainable materials and with a low carbon footprint.
If the funding for this ludicrous project has to be allocated to ecology, then this is where it should be spent.
And if funding is allocated to ecology then it should be put towards our atrocious potholes!
Ashford Future and Ashford Borough Council have contacted a not-for-profit company to run a pilot project on energy efficiency.
For "Not-for-profit company", please read "a poor excuse for a charity that feeds directly of government money and exploits the targeting system in the civil service as well as using up some of the hundreds of thousands of graduates without any jobs.
They prepared a presentation with a vast array of free stuff and explain how Ashford Future had commissioned them to look into how to make our homes more energy efficient.
To do this they would be giving away free stuff
Kennington and Bybrook wards have been selected in the pilot study which is to run until October 2010.
This pilot study will involve giving away free stuff
The team offering to conduct two surveys on properties to assess whether energy savings can be made.
From this survey you can get free stuff
This includes the Electricity Monitoring device, which retails at the price of £25. But for you, it will be free.
But Wait, There's More
Our council tax will also be used to supply "chimney balloons", "tap implants", "reflecting radiator panels" and much more.
And if that wasn't enough of a waste of our money, they will also have a
In addition to the free stuff, residents will also be able to find out about government subsidised cavity wall insulation, loft insulation and much more.
Don't forget the free stuff!
A Little Less Sarcastic Conclusion
The bare bones of the matter are the council tax is being wasted on yet another ludicrous project by Ashford Future's evasive and illogical partnership.
£450,000 is just the cost of the "free stuff". How much more did the project team, surveyors and consultants cost?
And this is only the pilot study. How much will it cost when it is rolled out across all wards in 2011?
Not to mention the fact that the majority of homeowners are entitled to subsidised energy-saving initiatives without such a gratuitous waste of money.
However, I know from talking to residents, that often the "subsidised part" is the small change. The "approved" companies charge consumers through the nose for the rest, and the government will only subsidise if you have the full amount done.
There are not many pensioners who could afford to pay £3000 to get £1000 of subsidiaries to have their radiators replaced.
I think that's the public services deficit for Mr Brown and Mr Darling to locate.
Failings in Future Planning
There is a significant strategic issue here too.
If companies were filling our town with Lego-brick-houses that cost too much and cost even more ecologically, we wouldn't have to have this retrospective funding in the first place.
The level of development in Ashford is one of the highest in the country, and, despite knowing about Climate change, no one is ensuring that this development consists of sustainable materials and with a low carbon footprint.
If the funding for this ludicrous project has to be allocated to ecology, then this is where it should be spent.
And if funding is allocated to ecology then it should be put towards our atrocious potholes!
Tuesday 30 March 2010
ABC Admits Plans are Set Before Consultation
This evening at the Kennington Community Forum, Ashford Borough Council planning surveyor Giles Holloway openly admitted to residents that their department applied to funding and allocated plans to relevant areas before they held public consultation.
Such a lack of democratic participation has become commonplace under the current Borough Council.
Responding to the audience's disbelief, the ABC surveyor offered no comfort residents of Kennington, Bybrook, Little Burton Farm and Bockhanger by insisting that although this was the case, residents were entitled to object and that the Council could change their minds.
There are far too many "crammed in" proposals being put forward by planning in an already congested area and the Borough Council's track record of overriding public opinion has created a cynical and discontent public.
Garage Sites
Towers View and Model Road residents will be losing the garage and parking facilities to be replaced by additional council housing.
The Planning Representative stated that the sites were underused, I'm slightly and suffered from vandalism. However, residents stated that they had never been informed there was aching garages available, and if they had been then they would have applied to release them.
Councillor Marian Martin pointed out the residents are contacted her considering parking issues in the wars in relation to the garage sites.
The loss of parasites may or may not reduce antisocial behaviour, the residents will suffer as well.
Car insurance will be set to rise for residents will have to park on streets
In addition to this, if, as Councillor Martin asserts she would like to see, the council introduces parking permits and feeds the residents, resident's purses will suffer even more.
While Ashford Borough Council has a significant lack of council tenant premises, there are plenty of sites that could be used that would not leave already deprived areas with even less space and more people.
Sheltered Housing Extensions
Gerlach House, situated on Beecholme Drive, has suffered greatly in recent years, with the removal of resident wardens which have effectively created a lockdown on the social of the residents used to enjoy and are now to be subject to further extensions.
Examining the plans provided by the planning department, it appears that the extension will result in two additional flats being added to the property. This will either mean that residents will lose their gardens or the car park.
After all, Sheltered Housing is designed to encourage older people to have continued independent living, why on earth would they need gardens or car parks?
One could also enquire as to whether this is a direct saving as a result of shifting Resident Wardens to a peripatetic scheme that involves the residents now in sheltered housing only being visited once every six weeks.
I cannot see how the council can be "saving money" by building additional flats, and it is likely, given the expensive of the planning, that after they had started charging rent to these premises, they will only just be breaking even.
In Conclusion
It shows the arrogance of our current Borough Council that planning officers are quite happy to admit that there is no democratic participation when it comes to people objecting to the development in their own neighbourhoods.
Only by continuously challenging, which takes time and energy, can we overthrows such a dictatorship of a Council and the effect that it is having on our local community.
If we're subjected to a Conservative Government later this year, their current planning proposals are to remove all consultation period on planning so that Councils will be able to build and build and build without any input from the public.
Such a lack of democratic participation has become commonplace under the current Borough Council.
Responding to the audience's disbelief, the ABC surveyor offered no comfort residents of Kennington, Bybrook, Little Burton Farm and Bockhanger by insisting that although this was the case, residents were entitled to object and that the Council could change their minds.
There are far too many "crammed in" proposals being put forward by planning in an already congested area and the Borough Council's track record of overriding public opinion has created a cynical and discontent public.
Garage Sites
Towers View and Model Road residents will be losing the garage and parking facilities to be replaced by additional council housing.
The Planning Representative stated that the sites were underused, I'm slightly and suffered from vandalism. However, residents stated that they had never been informed there was aching garages available, and if they had been then they would have applied to release them.
Councillor Marian Martin pointed out the residents are contacted her considering parking issues in the wars in relation to the garage sites.
The loss of parasites may or may not reduce antisocial behaviour, the residents will suffer as well.
Car insurance will be set to rise for residents will have to park on streets
In addition to this, if, as Councillor Martin asserts she would like to see, the council introduces parking permits and feeds the residents, resident's purses will suffer even more.
While Ashford Borough Council has a significant lack of council tenant premises, there are plenty of sites that could be used that would not leave already deprived areas with even less space and more people.
Sheltered Housing Extensions
Gerlach House, situated on Beecholme Drive, has suffered greatly in recent years, with the removal of resident wardens which have effectively created a lockdown on the social of the residents used to enjoy and are now to be subject to further extensions.
Examining the plans provided by the planning department, it appears that the extension will result in two additional flats being added to the property. This will either mean that residents will lose their gardens or the car park.
After all, Sheltered Housing is designed to encourage older people to have continued independent living, why on earth would they need gardens or car parks?
One could also enquire as to whether this is a direct saving as a result of shifting Resident Wardens to a peripatetic scheme that involves the residents now in sheltered housing only being visited once every six weeks.
I cannot see how the council can be "saving money" by building additional flats, and it is likely, given the expensive of the planning, that after they had started charging rent to these premises, they will only just be breaking even.
In Conclusion
It shows the arrogance of our current Borough Council that planning officers are quite happy to admit that there is no democratic participation when it comes to people objecting to the development in their own neighbourhoods.
Only by continuously challenging, which takes time and energy, can we overthrows such a dictatorship of a Council and the effect that it is having on our local community.
If we're subjected to a Conservative Government later this year, their current planning proposals are to remove all consultation period on planning so that Councils will be able to build and build and build without any input from the public.
Saturday 27 March 2010
Perturbing Parking Points in Question
The Kentish Express revealed this week that car parking prices are set to rise by a whacking 3.5%.
As the local paper points out, this is significantly higher than interest rates. It is also significantly higher than Council Tax rises, and one must wonder what the profit revenue is on the vast array of parking across Ashford.
Local Residents
Noted in the last paragraph, where the deliberate or not seeing is only 10% of readers of the get that far, on street parking will come into line with town centre car parks.
This is in order to "give town centre residents more chance to park nearer their homes".
What a wonderful social divide this provides-you are entitled to park nearer to your house in the event you can afford to do so.
Comparable Boroughs
The KM states;
But the costs are only catching up with the higher charges of Canterbury and Folkestone.
However, Canterbury has park-and-ride system which is significantly cheaper than the city centre car parks, and yet manages to fund an entire "every 10 minutes" bus service on these rates.
And while Folkestone might charge more for an hourly rate their residents parking permits and season tickets are significantly cheaper than ours, probably largely due to the fat that they do not have a direct line to London.
If Ashford Borough Council could justify an entire park and ride service based on an increase of 20p, which is the current rate in Canterbury for park-and-ride, I would be very impressed.
Revenue Accrued
Out of interest, I've been studying Ashford Borough Council's website on parking.
Based on the predicted price rises, ABC will accrue a whopping £1504.80 per hour.
This works out at £18,057.60 per day,
£126,403.20 per seven day week,
£547,747.20 per calendar month
and a terrifying £6,572,966.40 per year.
And yet the Welsh Assembly is able to offer free parking across the entire country.
Fields of Concrete
I must admit it has been sad to see in recent years Ashford being depleted to such a vast expanse of concrete. Elwick Road and Station Road, in particular, have slowly but surely being bulldozed, leaving open, asymmetrically lined ground instead of local businesses, community infrastructure or jobs.
I'm not against modernisation per se, but one has to question why so many additional parking spaces were needed in Ashford and why the suggestion that the Park and Ride complex were not made earlier.
Given the amount of money that the increased car park charges will be adding to Ashford Borough Council's coffers, I am amazed that it is not going through sooner.
But then again, how else could they afford a month's worth of consultancy fees on where to paint a use on the shared space initiative?
As the local paper points out, this is significantly higher than interest rates. It is also significantly higher than Council Tax rises, and one must wonder what the profit revenue is on the vast array of parking across Ashford.
Local Residents
Noted in the last paragraph, where the deliberate or not seeing is only 10% of readers of the get that far, on street parking will come into line with town centre car parks.
This is in order to "give town centre residents more chance to park nearer their homes".
What a wonderful social divide this provides-you are entitled to park nearer to your house in the event you can afford to do so.
Comparable Boroughs
The KM states;
But the costs are only catching up with the higher charges of Canterbury and Folkestone.
However, Canterbury has park-and-ride system which is significantly cheaper than the city centre car parks, and yet manages to fund an entire "every 10 minutes" bus service on these rates.
And while Folkestone might charge more for an hourly rate their residents parking permits and season tickets are significantly cheaper than ours, probably largely due to the fat that they do not have a direct line to London.
If Ashford Borough Council could justify an entire park and ride service based on an increase of 20p, which is the current rate in Canterbury for park-and-ride, I would be very impressed.
Revenue Accrued
Out of interest, I've been studying Ashford Borough Council's website on parking.
Based on the predicted price rises, ABC will accrue a whopping £1504.80 per hour.
This works out at £18,057.60 per day,
£126,403.20 per seven day week,
£547,747.20 per calendar month
and a terrifying £6,572,966.40 per year.
And yet the Welsh Assembly is able to offer free parking across the entire country.
Fields of Concrete
I must admit it has been sad to see in recent years Ashford being depleted to such a vast expanse of concrete. Elwick Road and Station Road, in particular, have slowly but surely being bulldozed, leaving open, asymmetrically lined ground instead of local businesses, community infrastructure or jobs.
I'm not against modernisation per se, but one has to question why so many additional parking spaces were needed in Ashford and why the suggestion that the Park and Ride complex were not made earlier.
Given the amount of money that the increased car park charges will be adding to Ashford Borough Council's coffers, I am amazed that it is not going through sooner.
But then again, how else could they afford a month's worth of consultancy fees on where to paint a use on the shared space initiative?
Friday 26 March 2010
ABC's Failure to Responds to Residents
The position of Dobbies "Garden Centre" versus Bybrook Garden Centre is something of a controversial issue in the town centre.
We are struggling to retain local businesses in Ashford as it is, and is a real shame to see councillors failing to represent their local residents views when responding to planning applications.
With petitions of 4672 signatures submitted to the Council as well as objection letters, this accounts for 80% of the voters in the four wards of Bybrook, Bockhanger, Kennington and Little Burton Farm.
If you consider back in the 2007 Borough Council elections, an average of 26% of these four wards voted.
Now of course, the signatures may not all be from people within this area, but it's a highly indicative move that such a large percentage of Ashford, who cannot usually be motivated to vote in the local elections, are motivated to stick up for and defend a local business run by local people in the face of the monopoly of supermarket chain stores.
We are struggling to retain local businesses in Ashford as it is, and is a real shame to see councillors failing to represent their local residents views when responding to planning applications.
With petitions of 4672 signatures submitted to the Council as well as objection letters, this accounts for 80% of the voters in the four wards of Bybrook, Bockhanger, Kennington and Little Burton Farm.
If you consider back in the 2007 Borough Council elections, an average of 26% of these four wards voted.
Now of course, the signatures may not all be from people within this area, but it's a highly indicative move that such a large percentage of Ashford, who cannot usually be motivated to vote in the local elections, are motivated to stick up for and defend a local business run by local people in the face of the monopoly of supermarket chain stores.
Thursday 25 March 2010
A Night to Remember: Tenterden Annual Dinner 2010
I warn you in advance that this post is going to have a distinctly personal edge.
I was invited to be one of the key speakers at the Tenterden at liberal Democrat Annual Dinner 2010 last year at the AGM. Barry Wright, our local party president requested that I talk about social networking and its use in politics and campaigning.
To my benefit, Shepway Liberal Democrat KCC Councillor Tim Prater had linked to an article via Twitter entitled Top 10 Reasons to use Social Media which gave me a starting point!
Getting There
However, I had to actually get to the dinner first. If you'd asked me prior to leaving yesterday, I would have said that driving to Tenterden was no problem.
I collected the other key speaker, Parliamentary Candidate Chris Took, and we set off in the dark with a relatively vague idea of where the restaurant The Station was.
It seems that my biggest mistake was attempting to turn round after I missed the restaurant! My rather lovely car hit a kerb and got lodged with the front wheels up in the air. because of my disability, I drive an automatic and this is also a front wheel drive. Moving the car proved to be very difficult! it was further hindered by the fact I've collected 4,000 freshly printed leaflets that afternoon that were in my boot! we ground to a halt at quarter past seven, the dinner was at half past seven, we finally arrived to a round of applause at half past eight!
The Dinner
The Station Restaurant is a wonderful cafe bar based at Tenterden Station, part of the Kent and East Sussex Railway and is staffed almost entirely by volunteers. Their service and food was impeccable and I would recommend anyone go there, irrespective of your interest in steam trains!
The Speech
Explaining social media to people that are not computer literate is a difficult subject to the best of times!
I began by revealing that myself and my partner tend to sit at either end of our three seater sofa with a laptop each and talk to each other on various networking sites. We do get ridiculed for this, but it is a growing trend in couples in their 20s. As I said to the audience, if myself and Dan are doing this and we are in our late 20s, imagine how teenagers are utilising social networking to communicate.
I then addressed Moores Law. while this concept applies to computer hardware, it can also be applied to social media and Internet software. Things are moving so quickly within digital technology and it is important to maintain a level of understanding and a level of strategic development within this market.
When I joined the Ashford Liberal Democrats last year, I largely took up the role of managing our Internet media. This included setting up a Face Book group (Ashford Liberal Democrat), a twitter accountband keeping actively involved with the local community online.
I tend to use social networking in campaigning not only to maintain communications, but also a former publication to get the message of our campaigns, news and policies to a wider audience.
When I knew I would be attending the Tenterden Annual Dinner, I could post that on Twitter, which informed 200 odd people. I could then post a link on the Ashford Face Book sites, which would inform a further 6000 people. I can then take the information and send out to every single Ashford community group Face Book site, from the Remembering Ashford The Way It Was to the Ashford R&B appreciation Society. By doing this I can probably hit an additional 5000 people.
Having such phenomenal power to communicate with so many people by doing something that is essentially free and takes a few minutes is a superb position to be in.
The Liberal Democrats suffer from being ignored by the major press and put on the back pages and latter paragraphs. However, by having a presence elsewhere, we can get our message across.
I also spoke about the various demographics that use Internet communications. While yes, the majority of people online are young, I have seen an increasing trend in older people and pensioners taking up the Internet. Not only do fantastic campaigns by Age UK assist in "getting people online", but these people often have more time to access the Internet for whatever reason.
There is also an interesting growth in people with disabilities using the Internet for further communication. A user of voice recognition software myself, I appreciate that the Internet is utilised by a variety of people who have difficulty communicating in other ways. For people with mobility difficulties, it may be their prime source of community as they are unable to get out and about as freely as other people. In that respect, I think the Internet is fantastic.
I also raised the issue of social media allowing campaigning and communications to remain local and personal. If I have something to say about Ashford, I can add a hash tag on Twitter, or I can make sure that I target specific groups. one brilliant example with face book that I utilised with the ability to see when people having celebrations. Therefore I knew that it was Barry Wright's birthday and brought along a card. By being aware of local issues and having a continuous stream of promotions and events, it has enabled the Liberal Democrats, not only in Ashford, but also across the country to become more involved with the local communities and raise their own profiles.
There is a wealth of ideas through which you can use Internet campaigning. Simply for acquiring signatures on petitions, raising money for charity events or providing people with posters that they can present themselves to advertise your events that they're interested in, it is a world that we need to be involved in in order to move politics into the 21st century.
The End
Chris Took provided a wonderful speech engineered to "whip the local group into a frenzy" with a great deal of focus on preparing for his second election as a PPC and raising the profile of Ashford Liberal Democrats across the entire constituency.
All in all a very successful evening, even if it did start somewhat badly in relation to my poor car!
I was invited to be one of the key speakers at the Tenterden at liberal Democrat Annual Dinner 2010 last year at the AGM. Barry Wright, our local party president requested that I talk about social networking and its use in politics and campaigning.
To my benefit, Shepway Liberal Democrat KCC Councillor Tim Prater had linked to an article via Twitter entitled Top 10 Reasons to use Social Media which gave me a starting point!
Getting There
However, I had to actually get to the dinner first. If you'd asked me prior to leaving yesterday, I would have said that driving to Tenterden was no problem.
I collected the other key speaker, Parliamentary Candidate Chris Took, and we set off in the dark with a relatively vague idea of where the restaurant The Station was.
It seems that my biggest mistake was attempting to turn round after I missed the restaurant! My rather lovely car hit a kerb and got lodged with the front wheels up in the air. because of my disability, I drive an automatic and this is also a front wheel drive. Moving the car proved to be very difficult! it was further hindered by the fact I've collected 4,000 freshly printed leaflets that afternoon that were in my boot! we ground to a halt at quarter past seven, the dinner was at half past seven, we finally arrived to a round of applause at half past eight!
The Dinner
The Station Restaurant is a wonderful cafe bar based at Tenterden Station, part of the Kent and East Sussex Railway and is staffed almost entirely by volunteers. Their service and food was impeccable and I would recommend anyone go there, irrespective of your interest in steam trains!
The Speech
Explaining social media to people that are not computer literate is a difficult subject to the best of times!
I began by revealing that myself and my partner tend to sit at either end of our three seater sofa with a laptop each and talk to each other on various networking sites. We do get ridiculed for this, but it is a growing trend in couples in their 20s. As I said to the audience, if myself and Dan are doing this and we are in our late 20s, imagine how teenagers are utilising social networking to communicate.
I then addressed Moores Law. while this concept applies to computer hardware, it can also be applied to social media and Internet software. Things are moving so quickly within digital technology and it is important to maintain a level of understanding and a level of strategic development within this market.
When I joined the Ashford Liberal Democrats last year, I largely took up the role of managing our Internet media. This included setting up a Face Book group (Ashford Liberal Democrat), a twitter accountband keeping actively involved with the local community online.
I tend to use social networking in campaigning not only to maintain communications, but also a former publication to get the message of our campaigns, news and policies to a wider audience.
When I knew I would be attending the Tenterden Annual Dinner, I could post that on Twitter, which informed 200 odd people. I could then post a link on the Ashford Face Book sites, which would inform a further 6000 people. I can then take the information and send out to every single Ashford community group Face Book site, from the Remembering Ashford The Way It Was to the Ashford R&B appreciation Society. By doing this I can probably hit an additional 5000 people.
Having such phenomenal power to communicate with so many people by doing something that is essentially free and takes a few minutes is a superb position to be in.
The Liberal Democrats suffer from being ignored by the major press and put on the back pages and latter paragraphs. However, by having a presence elsewhere, we can get our message across.
I also spoke about the various demographics that use Internet communications. While yes, the majority of people online are young, I have seen an increasing trend in older people and pensioners taking up the Internet. Not only do fantastic campaigns by Age UK assist in "getting people online", but these people often have more time to access the Internet for whatever reason.
There is also an interesting growth in people with disabilities using the Internet for further communication. A user of voice recognition software myself, I appreciate that the Internet is utilised by a variety of people who have difficulty communicating in other ways. For people with mobility difficulties, it may be their prime source of community as they are unable to get out and about as freely as other people. In that respect, I think the Internet is fantastic.
I also raised the issue of social media allowing campaigning and communications to remain local and personal. If I have something to say about Ashford, I can add a hash tag on Twitter, or I can make sure that I target specific groups. one brilliant example with face book that I utilised with the ability to see when people having celebrations. Therefore I knew that it was Barry Wright's birthday and brought along a card. By being aware of local issues and having a continuous stream of promotions and events, it has enabled the Liberal Democrats, not only in Ashford, but also across the country to become more involved with the local communities and raise their own profiles.
There is a wealth of ideas through which you can use Internet campaigning. Simply for acquiring signatures on petitions, raising money for charity events or providing people with posters that they can present themselves to advertise your events that they're interested in, it is a world that we need to be involved in in order to move politics into the 21st century.
The End
Chris Took provided a wonderful speech engineered to "whip the local group into a frenzy" with a great deal of focus on preparing for his second election as a PPC and raising the profile of Ashford Liberal Democrats across the entire constituency.
All in all a very successful evening, even if it did start somewhat badly in relation to my poor car!
Wednesday 24 March 2010
Southeastern Failure to Support Disabled People
Following my open letter to the Kentish Express in February on the removal of safety critical staff, a news report on the BBC was brought to my attention.
Mrs Clearly was informed by Southeastern Trains that she would have to make a 45 minute round trip to Ashford station in order to access the side of the platform so that she could leave the station in Staplehurst.
This is an excellent example of why Southeast in Trains have made a grave error in removing platform staff.
One key issue to me in the removal of Safety Critical Staff is disability access to and from domestic stations across the county.
I think that the current guidelines provided by Southeastern Trains that the disabled passenger ought to notify and pre-book assistance on the service is absolutely diabolical and is a classic example of discrimination against disabled people.
It is unfathomable in the 21st century that our train service, which is rated one of the worst in the European Union when compared to other services, is allowed to get away with making disabled passengers' journeys more difficult, complicated and more lengthily than anyone else's.
Mrs Clearly stated "I was astonished. Angry, at the fact that they'd spent all that money making this station accessible and it wasn't.
A vast amount of money is spent on making properties accessible on a regular basis. This should not mean that in spite of millions being spent, a person in a wheelchair should have to get her family to carry her down the stairs.
Given that Councillor Claughton considered that the removal of Safety Critical Staff from Southeastern was not an issue, I would like to invite his response now it is clear that it will cause significant issues for disabled people.
Mrs Clearly was informed by Southeastern Trains that she would have to make a 45 minute round trip to Ashford station in order to access the side of the platform so that she could leave the station in Staplehurst.
This is an excellent example of why Southeast in Trains have made a grave error in removing platform staff.
One key issue to me in the removal of Safety Critical Staff is disability access to and from domestic stations across the county.
I think that the current guidelines provided by Southeastern Trains that the disabled passenger ought to notify and pre-book assistance on the service is absolutely diabolical and is a classic example of discrimination against disabled people.
It is unfathomable in the 21st century that our train service, which is rated one of the worst in the European Union when compared to other services, is allowed to get away with making disabled passengers' journeys more difficult, complicated and more lengthily than anyone else's.
Mrs Clearly stated "I was astonished. Angry, at the fact that they'd spent all that money making this station accessible and it wasn't.
A vast amount of money is spent on making properties accessible on a regular basis. This should not mean that in spite of millions being spent, a person in a wheelchair should have to get her family to carry her down the stairs.
Given that Councillor Claughton considered that the removal of Safety Critical Staff from Southeastern was not an issue, I would like to invite his response now it is clear that it will cause significant issues for disabled people.
Shared Space Financial Farce
The much debated Shared Space in Ashford is to undergo consultation to define parking.
Surely to have a predefined area for parking negates the very premise of a shared space?!
Not to mention another enormous waste of money on consultation fees.
Consultation on the amendments begin on 1st April and will end on 23rd April.
Consultancy fees are very much an open market based on what a company are prepared to pay. Doing a small bit of research on the Internet, I discovered that it is very difficult to apportion an hourly rate for a highways consultant, but they can generally expect to earn circa £750 per hour.
This is where our council tax goes.
The shared space is contentious primarily because of its cost. 13 million is already a phenomenal amount of money when we're experiencing severe issues with potholes, apparently a lack of finances to maintain a "green waste" collection service not to mention significant drops in policing services.
I'm not saying whether I am pro or anti the shared space, but I find the kids doing parcour across Bank Street on a Saturday morning quite amusing and also find the multilayered parking on Sundays up the sides of Bank Street just as entertaining.
But I do resent the vast amount that I invest in our councils and public services being shipped out to consultants to debate the design of parking spaces on an already extortionate shared space initiative over 21 days.
I'm sure that there are a number of the unemployed in Ashford who could quite easily point out where parking bays could be marked on the road and would do the whole lot for £750.
Surely to have a predefined area for parking negates the very premise of a shared space?!
Not to mention another enormous waste of money on consultation fees.
Consultation on the amendments begin on 1st April and will end on 23rd April.
Consultancy fees are very much an open market based on what a company are prepared to pay. Doing a small bit of research on the Internet, I discovered that it is very difficult to apportion an hourly rate for a highways consultant, but they can generally expect to earn circa £750 per hour.
This is where our council tax goes.
The shared space is contentious primarily because of its cost. 13 million is already a phenomenal amount of money when we're experiencing severe issues with potholes, apparently a lack of finances to maintain a "green waste" collection service not to mention significant drops in policing services.
I'm not saying whether I am pro or anti the shared space, but I find the kids doing parcour across Bank Street on a Saturday morning quite amusing and also find the multilayered parking on Sundays up the sides of Bank Street just as entertaining.
But I do resent the vast amount that I invest in our councils and public services being shipped out to consultants to debate the design of parking spaces on an already extortionate shared space initiative over 21 days.
I'm sure that there are a number of the unemployed in Ashford who could quite easily point out where parking bays could be marked on the road and would do the whole lot for £750.
Saturday 20 March 2010
Controversy on Immigration on the Highstreet
Today I was on the Highstreet in Ashford talking to local people about the forthcoming election.
Being in Kent, one subject comes up again and again and I feel I ought to address the issue here.
Eastern Europeans.
People enquired what the Liberal Democrats were going to do about immigration.
But what they actually meant was what were we going to do about migration.
There is a simple distinction between the two that I find the public, predominately Daily Mail and Tabloid readers, get confused.
In the UK Immigration is the term used to describe those moving from another country to the UK and the EU to live and claim residence. The predominate nature of migration is assylum seekers and refugees.
However, the term Migration refers to people who move within the European Union and are entitled to work and live within any EU country and come and go as they please.
Ultimately, no party in power is going to prevent economic migration, whether Eastern or Western European, as it would be going against European Legislation.
As the corridor to Europe, Kent suffers from a flow of both migrants and immigrants. The latter is now dispersed accross the country following the UK Borders Act 2007 and subsequent legislation surrounding the Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009 and UK Borders Agency.
However, when chatting, canvassing or debating with residents, I often find they confuse the issues.
Comments and sound bites are generally thrown at me such as "British Jobs for British Workers" and "floodgates had been opened to mass immigration".
If someone is generally talking about immigration, my favourite response is "do you know any immigrants?". I generally find that the response is "well it is all in the papers". The answer is clearly no, and they are responding to a media pandemic of scaremongering and illogical concepts.
The paticular incident today was about European Migration and the people cited a number of local incidents of assaults in Ashford.
Whether Eastern Europeans were responsible or not is not the issue to me. The issue is, we do not have enough police on the streets.
It would be interesting to see a demographic study of crime in Ashford and see if there are predominate migration issues, but I would hazard a guess that it is an irrelevant issue.
The issues that come with migration are tackled by other areas. If there are assaults, then it is police. And the Liberal Democrats are the only party to pledge an increase in police numbers and a dedication to preventing crime.
Being in Kent, one subject comes up again and again and I feel I ought to address the issue here.
Eastern Europeans.
People enquired what the Liberal Democrats were going to do about immigration.
But what they actually meant was what were we going to do about migration.
There is a simple distinction between the two that I find the public, predominately Daily Mail and Tabloid readers, get confused.
In the UK Immigration is the term used to describe those moving from another country to the UK and the EU to live and claim residence. The predominate nature of migration is assylum seekers and refugees.
However, the term Migration refers to people who move within the European Union and are entitled to work and live within any EU country and come and go as they please.
Ultimately, no party in power is going to prevent economic migration, whether Eastern or Western European, as it would be going against European Legislation.
As the corridor to Europe, Kent suffers from a flow of both migrants and immigrants. The latter is now dispersed accross the country following the UK Borders Act 2007 and subsequent legislation surrounding the Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009 and UK Borders Agency.
However, when chatting, canvassing or debating with residents, I often find they confuse the issues.
Comments and sound bites are generally thrown at me such as "British Jobs for British Workers" and "floodgates had been opened to mass immigration".
If someone is generally talking about immigration, my favourite response is "do you know any immigrants?". I generally find that the response is "well it is all in the papers". The answer is clearly no, and they are responding to a media pandemic of scaremongering and illogical concepts.
The paticular incident today was about European Migration and the people cited a number of local incidents of assaults in Ashford.
Whether Eastern Europeans were responsible or not is not the issue to me. The issue is, we do not have enough police on the streets.
It would be interesting to see a demographic study of crime in Ashford and see if there are predominate migration issues, but I would hazard a guess that it is an irrelevant issue.
The issues that come with migration are tackled by other areas. If there are assaults, then it is police. And the Liberal Democrats are the only party to pledge an increase in police numbers and a dedication to preventing crime.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Loaded Web
